
The Guardian has paid someone called Jessica Valenti to write an article about her upcoming wedding. What could possibly be so interesting about Jessica Valenti's wedding? Well, she's a feminist, apparently, and she started the blog feministing.com.
Why would a 'feminist wedding' be a particular novelty? Apart from the bit about getting slagged off by fellow feminists for marrying in the first place...
===================================
1. A feminist talks with her partner about getting married, and they jointly arrive at a decision that being married is a good idea.
2. A feminist keeps her surname.
3. A feminist is not 'given away' by her father at her wedding.
4. A feminist does not wear a white dress.
5. A feminist does not promise in her vows to 'obey' her groom.
6. A feminist and her husband are jointly involved in the planning of the wedding.
===================================
Ooh and to think I never considered myself a feminist! I fit all those criteria! Actually, wait, basically all this is saying is that having a wedding that fits your own preferences, that isn't exactly like everyone else's, that doesn't involve changing your name and abandons all of the most stupid conventions makes your wedding feminist.
1. Common sense. Although Gam still bemoans on daily basis the fact that he didn't 'give me the proposal I deserved' (i.e. the one he imagines everyone else has- some fairytale crap), anyone who waits for 'the proposal' to start discussing anything but the mechanics of the wedding itself must have rocks in their head.
2. Okay, I kept my surname because I'm too lazy to change it, not because I think the name-changing convention entails upholding a sexist institution. Frankly I'd be perfectly happy to change it. I honestly don't care what anyone else thinks on the matter, feminist or 'traditional', I like my current surname because it's easily identifiable- I like being easy to find on the electoral roll on polling day- but so is Gam's. And we still haven't decided what we're going to do when it comes to naming our kids. I suppose that conversation will depend on whether I'm too lazy to bother changing my name before we finally get around to having them.
3. Maybe this one does make me a feminist in the eyes of some people- I think the whole idea of a woman being 'given away' is gross and reeks of a not-too-distant past where women were effectively chattel. I just happen to believe that not looking fondly on a dehumanising tradition is, again, common sense (and shouldn't necessarily subscribe me to a whole host of beliefs and opinions that I want no part in).
4. The white dress thing? People think they're making A Statement by not wearing one? I didn't wear one because they are boring, not because they 'symbolise purity'. I mean, come on- I think my cousin Rach is the only person of my generation that I know personally who will be married without ever having had sex with the person she's getting married to (not something I would encourage anyone to do, but we'll see how it goes). She's abnormal in this day and age, but wearing a white dress certainly isn't.
5. Does anyone promise to 'obey' their groom these days? My grandma didn't, and she's no feminist (despite a few material characteristics that might make her attitude to life sound more feminist than it really is). My Mum didn't, and she's some kind of cross between a saint and a doormat. I didn't, but not because I thought I was giving some kind of 'fuck you' to 'teh patriarchy', but because it's common fucking sense. Oh and it would have been a lie anyway.
6. I have known people (all women, naturally) who had basically dreamed up their wedding to the finest detail before they'd even met their
Finally, I couldn't resist clicking over to the National Review to see what Kathryn Jean Lopez (deranged right-wing nutbag) wrote to mock "my attempts to subvert traditional wedding standards", as Valenti put it. As it turned out, Lopez didn't write much at all- just copied and pasted a whole heap of stuff from feministing.com. Maybe she felt she didn't need to do a whole lot of mocking.
Several of you also got into it about dresses - whether the traditional white dress actually did signify "purity," etc. I'm kind of ambivalent about it, but I ended up getting a not-quite white dress (don't want to give too much away in case the boy is reading!)
In case 'the boy' is reading, eh?
Subversion FAIL.
Every single other moronic bridezilla type does the whole 'it's bad luck/wrong/less romantic for the groom to see you in the wedding dress before the wedding' crap.
It's funny, Gam and I had to do an awful lot of arguing to have our wedding the way we wanted it (i.e. religion-free). That was about our beliefs, and about not bending them to anyone else's, I suppose. But everything else was just a matter of personal taste. There's no pressure to wear a white dress. There's no pressure to obey. There's no pressure to change your name. If there is, it's not because of 'teh patriarchy', it's because you're hanging around the wrong sort of people.
If only I'd believed myself a persecuted feminist for having a wedding somewhat like Jessica Valenti's, I might have made a buck out of flogging our story to the Guardian. Shame. I really ought to be more entrepreneurial.
















































