Saturday, November 13, 2010

Nougat Limar. They put WHAT in it??

Sure, it looks good...

I am a lover of nougat. My personal preference is for the hard (chewy, not brittle) Italian-style torrone. I detest nougat with peanuts and dislike pretty much any with any kind of dried fruit except sour cherries, as well as nougat flavoured with  chocolate etc. I like plain nougat with pistachios, almonds or macadamias, in that order, maybe with a bit of honey as long as it doesn't up the sweetness too much.

Now, being a fairly simple product with few ingredients, even the nougat I 'dislike' is generally fairly edible. Definitely not objectionable, so I have no qualms about giving an unfamiliar nougat a go.

After a bad experience buying a new nougat at some markets a few years ago, however, I tried to break myself of this happy-go-lucky approach to nougat. The nougat I bought at the markets tasted salty. "WTF?", I thought at the time. "Nougat doesn't have salt!". I checked the ingredients listed for the pistachio, cherry and cranberry 'Nougat Limar' I had just purchased. Salt was in the list of ingredients. I resolved never to buy the disgusting stuff again. It was hard- I kept seeing this appealing-looking nougat everywhere. Nougat even appeared in the bulk food aisle at Mrs Flannery's, and after buying, tasting and discarding it because it was salty I'm pretty sure it was Nougat Limar, as it was the same pistachio and cranberry flavour as I'd once bought at those markets.

I had made a habit of satisfying my nougat cravings with a reliable purchase of pistachio torrone from the wonderful deli Samios Foods whenever we went there. But slowly it disappeared from their shelves and was not restocked. The horror! So today I did a very stupid thing. I saw some very attractive-looking pistachio nougat at the equally wonderful Superior Fruit. They stock lots of high-quality products. Could it be a good one? I gave it a squeeze and it didn't feel too squishy (I only realised later that it said 'soft, French-style'), so I popped it in our basket. It was Nougat Limar, but I couldn't remember the brand of the Nougat I had resolved never to buy. I didn't think to check the ingredients list to ascertain whether it was dodgy until after it had been passed through the register. What can I say, it was 11am and I hadn't even had a coffee, let alone breakfast! Salt. Never mind, I was starving and had no time to eat any real food before breastfeeding Setri and putting him down for a nap. I tried a piece. The taste of salt was there alright, but it wasn't as overpowering as I remembered.

Later I came back for more. There was another odd taste that really shouldn't be present. Real nougat is made, basically, from egg whites and sugar. It has a very clean taste. This tasted cloying, claggy... it tasted of... powdered milk! That was it!

I checked the ingredients list, reading it thoroughly this time.

Sure enough: 'Milk solids'. Powdered milk! Nougat Limar don't just put in salt, they put powdered bloody milk in their 'nougat'. No wonder it's so revolting. Why is this stuff everywhere??? (Don't tell me the answer to that- I know the sad answer is because most people eat it and like it... most people have no taste!).

Got to find me some genuine, chewy hard torrone to drown my sorrows, to alleviate my thwarted craving for good, honest nougat *sob*.


What's more, on their website they have a link to a page titled 'Our Ingredients'. Except it doesn't tell you a single frickin' thing about their ingredients! It has the varieties of 'nougat' that they flog to unsuspecting consumers, and a big, breathy announcement that "Nougat Limar is Gluten Free". Oh yes, they're so special... just like all those other nougats that taste better, don't have shonky ingredients and are also gluten free because- get this- EGG WHITES AND SUGAR AND NUTS ARE ALL GLUTEN FREE!


GRR.


Why yes, yes I am feeling especially ranty tonight. But the shonky bastards deserved it- I already had a pent-up tirade from the first time I tried their stupid salty nougat a couple of years ago :)

Friday, October 15, 2010

The latest in a grand tradition of anti-porn screeds in the mainstream media

Gam sent me a link to this garbage anti-porn article by a (groan) 'Professor of Women's Studies' that I had missed because it was published in the opinion section on the Brisbane Times website. I have so little time to blog these days (let alone do all the stuff that I should be getting done!) that I shouldn't have even read it, knowing I wouldn't be able to help penning a suitably ranty response, but at least I kept it pretty much in point form rather than writing an essay like I did last time.

==================================
Gail Dines on 'porn'. Rather than addressing her sweeping generalisation of the broad diversity of tastes catered for in the real world of porn, I will refer you here to show you exactly what kind of bunk is created when some ignoramus takes a position based on some stupid stereotype of porn. Hereafter just assume that every time Dines writes the word 'porn' she is referring to something hardcore featuring a generic blonde with anus lipstick and silicone boobs being roughly penetrated by 'any number' of well-equipped, ungentlemanly brutes.


"The men they date, have sex with and marry are increasingly being brought up on a steady diet of porn, and the more they watch, the less capable they are of forming connected, intimate relationships."

• Proof? Cite studies?


"The porn these men consume looks nothing like your father's Playboy."

• Really? The same Playboy that 'women's studies' professors spent years railing against as sexist and harmful? I own a Playboy collection ranging through vintage and modern issues spanning nearly 50 years, and the old ones, while being incredibly tame in terms of the visual depictions of women (and extraordinarily literary in their content), are written with a now quaint, old-fashioned sexist bent, despite being reasonably progressive and liberal for their time in terms of women's sexuality.

• It might not 'look like' your father's Playboy, but that's because the content in dear old Dad's Playboy is now pretty much PG rated in the wider context of the amount of flesh it's permissible to display in any visual media in this day and age. Why *should* porn look like your father's Playboy? Playboy never called itself porn anyway, it was nutbag feminists and religious extremists (who have a lot more in common than either group would care to admit) who labelled it such.


"Consumers are catapulted into a world of cruel and brutal sex acts designed to dehumanise women"

- What Dines is saying is that porn is a vast, anti-woman conspiracy. It's not as simple as people wanting to get off, oh no! No, it's a James Bond-style plot hatched by people (i.e. men) who HATE WOMEN and want to victimise them. How can something so preposterous get published in a mainstream newspaper? How? How can someone who spews such tripe, with a blatantly sexist, anti-male bent, be employed at an institution of higher learning?

This is what really gets my goat about anti-porn campaigners. Sheila Jeffries, Dines, they are all highly paid 'academics' who aren't subject to the kind of rigorous review and standards that academics in other fields are subject to. Their extremism is rewarded because they are in a field characterised by nutbaggery and populated by nutbags. It doesn't matter to what extent their work is based on crazed and unfounded claims, because the more it is, the more it is rewarded. Alternate views don't get a look in- women who aren't in complete lockstep (which is most of them, I'll wager), are ostracised and pilloried as brainwashed victims of the invented conspiracy that these overpaid academic feminists spend their careers railing against. They might be respected in their field, but that's because the field is populated not with scientists, who are compelled to adhere to certain standards of objectivity, but with fellow extremists. Universities employ these feminist nutbags because they're big in their field, but in doing so they do themselves a disservice and undermine the very standards in research and education that they purport to uphold. It's a disgrace.


"In the vast majority of porn today, sex is not about making love... connection, empathy, tenderness, caring, affection- are missing, and in their place are those we normally associate with hate- fear, disgust, anger, loathing and contempt".

• Outright bullshit. Porn was never meant to be about portraying sex as being about making love. Sex itself is primarily not about connection, empathy, tenderness etc. etc. It's a biological urge. It can be done in that context, sure, but the other- feeling sexual pleasure just for pleasure's sake- is no less legitimate. There is such a massive, mind-boggling variety of porn out there, and I am 100% certain that Professor (ugh) Dines pulled that grand, sweeping generalisation out of her arse. It's a popular misconception, and it's only popular because people like Dines get published and people like me, who actually watch porn, don't.


"In the vast majority of porn today... as [the female performer] is being roughly penetrated by any number of men, she is being called vile names such as whore, slut, and worse."

• Proof? In the vast majority of porn? How many men? Called names? If you're going to imply that you've studied the stuff and looked at the numbers, cough up some data, woman. Where was that published, exactly?

• Also, the insinuation is that somehow sex that might be characterised as rough, a quickie, fast-and-furious, is somehow non-consensual and degrading to women. Lots of women like rough sex! I like rough sex! If I was a 'professor of women's studies' I might be tempted to pull a sweeping, unfounded pseudo-statistical generalisation out of my arse, such as "a majority of women like rough sex", but I'm not, so I won't. I am confident in saying, however, that it is likely that in the vast majority of porn depicting rough sex, whether with multiple partners or not, the sex is 100% consensual.


"We often hear that porn is all about fun and fantasy, so it has no real effect. My interviews with university-age men tell a very different story."

• See, if this woman's work and any of the journals that published it had even a modicum of scientific credibility, any reviewer would be screaming "SELECTION BIAS, you idiot, SELECTION BIAS!!". What kind of 'university-aged' man would volunteer to speak to some anti-porn-campaigner women's studies professor about their own porn habits? No sane person would believe that their confessional would be treated objectively by an anti-porn 'researcher' (who has already decided what she would like the outcome of her 'research' to be, thankyouverymuch). Her 'research' is likely to consist of interviews with young men who believe that porn is a problem for them, not a broad spectrum of young men in the community. Dines doesn't acknowledge this, of course. What matters to her is not the credibility of her data, just that it backs up her preconceived notions.



"Unlike previous generations, these boys and men have unlimited access to hard-core images 24 hours a day".

• Does that conjure up an image of some dishevelled male, frazzled by hours of self-abuse, in a darkened room lit only by a computer screen displaying pornographic imagery? You betcha! Men, given a computer, will do nothing but access hard-core porn 24 hours a day! They can't help themselves! It's there, so they just keep chugging it down, like an addictive mixture of red cordial and heroin.



"Many of the men I talk to believe that porn sex is what women want, and they become upset and angry when their sex partner, perhaps their wife, girlfriend, or a one night hook-up, refuses to look or behave like their favourite porn star."

• Oh. My. Goodness. So much wrong with this claim it's hard to know where to start. I'll start from the end and work backwards.

1. Let's spell this out. Guy gets lucky and convinces a girl to hook up with him. Alright!! Sex is on the menu! Now choose the most likely option:

  • a) Guy can't believe his luck, starts tearing off his clothes in a hurry so he can get some action in case he's about to wake up and finds it's all a dream.

  •  b) Guy sits random hook-up down and says 
"Ok, go to the bathroom, put on these heels and bung on a bit more eyeliner. By the way I'm going to call you Jenna while we're doing it, I hope you won't mind." Then, when the woman in question laughs in his face, he flies into a rage.

2. Let's tease apart the rest of what Dines has said...

  • A man can believe that 'porn sex is what women want' (let's ignore the fact that 'porn sex' in fact encompasses every kind of sex known to humankind and keep it within the narrow-minded spirit that the author intended this passage to be read in, shall we?).

  •  A man can be affronted and angry when his wife or girlfriend (let's ignore the preposterous idea that a one-night hook-up would be subjected to this one, shall we?) refuses to 'look or behave like [the man's] favourite porn star.'

  • I think a reasonable person would agree that a reasonable man who somehow convinced himself that 'porn sex is what women want' (haha) would, when confronted with information to the contrary, adjust his view in light of this new information.

  • I think a reasonable person would agree that a man who not only convinced himself that 'porn sex is what women want' but then got angry when confronted with the fact that his wife or girlfriend did not, in fact, want this so-called 'porn sex', could quite reasonably be labelled deranged.

Q.E.D. Dines has admitted that many of the men she has talked to are deranged. Now, is she saying that a substantial proportion of men in the population at large are thus deranged?


"Next to the screaming orgasms and sexual gymnastics of porn sex (again, we must ignore reality and adhere to the Dines Dictionary definition of 'porn sex' to comprehend this statement), real sex with real women starts to feel boring and bland."

• Given that Dines has admitted, albeit unwittingly, that her sample is subject to the worst kind of selection bias and her subjects are, in fact, deranged, this statement actually makes sense. In that context.

• I feel confident in saying, however, that contrary to Dines' implication that all men who view pornography (and thus pretty much all men) are wont to view real sex with indifference and instead prefer porn... ROFLMAO!!!!!! What kind of idiot would seriously suggest something like that???!!




"These men have become so accustomed to porn sex (refer to Dines Dictionary) that some are disappointed by their own sexual performance."

• Wait, only some? Not 'many'? So, while 'many' men in Dines' sample held women to a (stereotypical) porn standard, only 'some' held themselves to the same standard. This again confirms the fucked-up-ness of the sort of guy who would talk to a confirmed anti-porn feminist about their porn habits. Again, I say, NOT representative of the male population as a whole.


"They need to pull up the porn images in their head in order to have an orgasm with their partner."

• Do I need to spell it out? The sort of men who talk to this woman are sufferers of serious sexual disorders! That there is some diagnostic criteria for severely dysfunctional sexual behaviour. If not mental disorders in general, going by some of the other things she has said about these men.

• How, then, is it not extremely offensive and sexist to extrapolate this data obtained by interviewing a subset of the male population who suffer from mental and sexual dysfunction across the male population as a whole? WHY is this tripe being published?



"I had been somewhat sceptical of the addiction model, thinking that it was a way for men to avoid taking responsibility for their porn use. However... sex and relationship therapists Wendy Maltz and Larry Maltz discuss in their book The Porn Trap ..."

• Hang on right there. You're an academic and your reference for this pile of crap you're writing is a couple of sex therapists who wrote a sensationalist, anti-porn book. Honestly! This speaks volumes about the field of women's studies and the universities that pay fat salaries to a select group of women whose profession is spouting unfounded crap.




"While men may share their favourite porn stories, they don't tend to talk to each other about their addictive behaviour..."

• I'm sorry, men what? 'Porn stories'?! I can't say that men don't have special men-only gatherings where they swap their 'favourite porn stories'. Whilst I suspect this is a figment of Dines' imagination, if 'men' did engage in this particular activity I suppose that as a woman I wouldn't be included. From what I've seen of porn, which is probably more than Dines, porn that does have a story is the exception these days. What does that leave to swap? "So then this chick walks into a room where there's a couch, and there's this guy and pretty soon most of their clothes are off and they're doing it". "Awesome! That sounds just like the one I saw last week, except it had two chicks!". "Well the last one I saw didn't even have a guy, there was just this one chick, and a vibrator..."



"If we are really going to tackle porn, however, we... need to build a long-term, multi-pronged movement that involves building coalitions, grassroots education programs, and media strategies that eventually lead to cultural change."

• What, like the current media strategy of printing only anti-porn screeds, typically written by overpaid academic feminists with a tenuous grasp on reality?

• And why do we need to 'tackle porn'? Porn is not the problem! A minority of people have the kind of problem with porn that Dines describes, and the solution is not to obliterate pornography. Mental problems and sexual disorders require appropriate treatment, but we don't need to put the rest of the world in a straitjacket to treat the problems of a small number of people.

• As is typical of anti-porn screeds published in the mainstream media, all porn is lumped in the same basket with no acknowledgement of the diversity of tastes that it caters to. Porn is easily more reflective of human diversity than any other mainstream visual entertainment medium and I'll wager that any real research would back that up. We won't see anything approaching real research from the likes of Dines, however.


"As long as we have porn, women will never be seen as full human beings deserving of all the rights that men have... There is no room for porn in a just society"


• Oh what a crock. As Gam likes to point out, anti-porn campaigners like Dines exhibit a massive blind spot when it comes to gay porn, because it undermines bullshit arguments such as the one above. It's a stupid statement, an unfounded one, and underscores the fact that the academic credentials of anyone in the field of 'women's studies' are immediately suspect. Dines' views are rightly relegated to the opinion pages, but she's masquerading as some sort of social scientist when she really has no more credibility in this field than the average religious nutbag who might pen a similar anti-porn screed. Professor my arse. How can someone get paid to come up with such crap?

Thursday, September 23, 2010

Not Gisele: 23 weeks on and still saggy

 At least my old clothes now fit!

Well it's not as if it wasn't obvious that I wouldn't be modelling a bikini 2 minutes after giving birth, a la Gisele Bundchen. And, like I was at 11 weeks postpartum I'm still unsure as to whether I'll ever be able to wear a bikini again... I've already made Gam very sad by buying my first one-piece swimsuit in more than 10 years (i.e. since I had a say in what kind of swimsuit I wore!).


 Still have lots of extra skin...

I bought from Trixan Body, for anyone who's interested- I really hate swimsuit shopping... not because I'm insecure, but because there is just so much crap out there and I hate wasting my time trying it on. Trixan Body have 'free postage and free returns', so you can buy as many things as you like to try on, and send back what doesn't fit, and I took full advantage! I ordered 5 one-piece suits and sent back 3... brilliant system, even if I did buy one more swimsuit than I meant to! I doubt I'll ever shop for swimmers anywhere else.

 Bellybutton skin...

I've lost a bit more weight since 11 weeks, and am now back to my pre-pregnancy weight. The downside of that is that the stretched skin on my stomach hasn't kept up as much as it might have, and I still have quite a lot extra. However, it must be a lot better than it was, because it used to look so gross when I was lying down- all wrinkly- and now it doesn't look anywhere near as bad. More like the stomach of a 50-year-old than a 100-year-old... just a tiny hint of wrinkle now! Oh, but lying on my side my stomach still looks like it's melting off my body. Pretty bad, but it was fairly horrifying before, so it's definitely better than it was! I'm pleased with how the stretchmarks are fading too. Note to anyone who's curious: I did not apply any magic creams or oils, not even moisturiser... I did try and remember to do something like that a few times (no more than about 4-5 times in 23 weeks) with free samples of nice-smelling oils I got sent when I bought some baby clothes for Setri, but most of the time I barely remember to shave my legs, let alone apply nice oils and things... and at least this way I'm not tempted to credit magic oils and creams with stretchmark-fading properties, which I might be if I had used them on a regular basis.

Stomach skin... hard to believe that it used to be even worse!

My bellybutton looks normal when I lie down, but not when I stand up... it kind of slumps forward under the extra skin and looks pretty bloody sad. I finally got to see a physio at the hospital about a month ago, where my stomach muscles were checked for separation and I was also checked internally for signs of prolapse or other damage. There was good news all around in terms of the fascia between my abdominal muscles repairing itself, as well as there being no obvious internal damage, but the physio said that the fascia between my abs had been stretched and might always be a couple of centimetres wider than it used to be, particularly around my bellybutton, so I'll have a bit less waist definition than I used to, by the looks of it... My bellybutton is a bit of a joke, there is so much extra skin on top of it, and it's almost like it's been uprooted from wherever it used to be positioned in my stomach. I'm happy to know that I'm fine to do sit-up-type motions... not that I ever do sit-ups, but getting out of bed while lifting Setri, that kind of thing.

I was actually chuffed when the physio seemed impressed by my stomach muscles- Gam and I hadn't yet got around to doing even a token effort at exercise at the time. Since then we have been for one short jog and 2 days ago I attended a supposedly easy pilates/yoga-mix class at the gym my cousin Rach goes to... The muscles I do have are pretty strong (arms and stomach), but the muscles that have wasted in my year or so without exercise (bum, thighs, inner-thighs, calves) were so non-existent that I was in pain within a few seconds of starting the class! The pain after the class was all good pain, though, and I've resolved to do a bit more exercise.

I say I'm not insecure, but I have noticed that when we are having people over I avoid wearing anything that would require me to lift up my top to breastfeed Setri and thus reveal my stomach... so I guess I am a little insecure. I'm happy enough with how things are going, but I do feel my body is still a little gross for public consumption.

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Not going bald, but it was a near thing...

I had a nice moment of surprise and relief the other day when I was brushing my hair (what little of it that is left) and realised that I had an 'undercoat' of new hair beginning to grow. Phew!

In other news, Setri is crawling, but not very far, nor very fast. He is obsessed with the cats and tries to crawl to them... they feel perfectly safe sitting still and watching him until he comes within arm's reach. I figure the day they high-tail it as soon as Setri starts marching their way is the day we can truly say he is crawling.

Sunday, September 19, 2010

The Australian wets itself over Green-bashing backlash

The Australian has gotten all defensive over the unsettled reaction among its media colleagues and competitors over the way it engaged in open Green-bashing last week. What a complete joke. Seriously, 'tough reporting'? Portraying open calls for the destruction of the Greens as serious journalistic scrutiny?

They're not kidding anyone any more, and it's got them worried.

Chickens!




We did it! I am finally, as Gam put it, 'living the dream'.

2 weeks ago we got ourselves 2 chickens, a pair of scruffy ISA Browns. We had figured we'd be waiting a few years before we got ourselves a couple of chooks- that we'd first make sure we had proper fences, at least- but a work colleague of Gam's was giving away a couple of tame-ish chickens, so he volunteered to take them, and spent a weekend knocking together a rather nice coop for them in our concreted, unused 'pig-on-a-spit area'.

Given that the two chickens (as yet unnamed and referred to as 'Bad Chicken' and 'The Other One') had supposedly once been pets prior to residing with Gam's colleague's mother, I was surprised they were in such poor condition. They were underweight and their feathers were dull and patchy. I was a little worried that they might be a bit old, but we'd been told they were regular layers, and they were. I think that rather than being fed layer pellets and grain they'd merely been left to forage for their own food in the nice old lady's backyard.

Unfortunately they don't seem to know how to perch and have been roosting in and on one of the nest boxes, meaning I have to clean their poo out of it every day! Thankfully they lay in the other nest box!

Anyway, after a couple of days of ready access to feed they were already noticeably heavier. Two weeks on, they've grown more feathers and are much glossier and healthier looking than in these photos, though they are still missing a few feathers in places.

They are reasonably tame, though not as tame as the chickens I had growing up. They have each laid an egg every second day (on the same day, in the same nest box) since we got them, but I figured that frequency of laying would increase once they put on some condition, and we were duly rewarded with one extra egg on their 'off day' on Friday, so that's a good sign.

It's so nice having home-grown eggs- they are noticeably fresher than bought eggs, and I love knowing they come from happy chickens. The girls are mostly confined in their yard, but I let them out for a scratch in the dirt most days, which they love. They dug up the herb garden (which survived), and my Mum and I went for a walk after forgetting we'd let them out and came back to find them scratching in our neighbour's yard! Oops! Thankfully we have great neighbours and no damage was done, but Gam was a bit cranky with me and started muttering something about 'stew' when he found out...

Gam is already talking about getting a couple more chickens- I'm keen on getting a couple of heritage-breed chicks (I have always wanted to own some cool-looking fancy breeds... I once had silkies and they were great) from one of the local places that sells them- but I want to wait a while, as baby chicks need a lot of care and attention if they are to become as tame as I'd like, and when Setri is a little bit older he will get a lot of enjoyment out of raising some, I reckon.



























First eggs! Of course I had to photograph them!

Monday, September 13, 2010

In Australia we don't even get the pretence of 'fair and balanced'



That fine old mouthpiece of Rupert Murdoch, The Australian, has openly called for the Greens to be 'destroyed'. Every person with two brain cells to rub together knew that the News Ltd rags are biased, sure, but for them to be so bold as to actually come out and say it is a pretty scary thing, in my view. They have just called for the destruction of the only party with a humanitarian, non-bigoted policy platform, the only party in favour of free universal health AND dental care. The only party who support an egalitarian system of free public education instead of funnelling money into the pockets of schools attended by the children of people like Rupert Murdoch. The only party who have enough conviction on climate change to actually do something about it. Rupert Murdoch wants them destroyed. Makes me even more glad we signed up as Greens members after the election. That's just incredible. What a bloody hide.

Via Jeremy @ Pure Poison.

Wednesday, September 08, 2010

Stephanie Rice is NOT the problem



I don't really want to defend Stephanie Rice. What she wrote on her twitter account after the Wallabies beat South Africa was pretty much the equivalent of dropping the N-bomb. But it was absolutely not used in a way such that she intended it to be homophobic. It was the equivalent of calling someone, or something, 'gay' in the schoolyard, without giving second thought to its meaning. Doesn't mean it's alright in any sense, but after seeing the media gleefully pile on and refer to her tweet as 'homophobic' and 'anti-gay', I really feel like that's a little much. Ian Roberts, too. What, do you have another book coming out, Ian?

This is the same media that won't call someone like Tony Abbott a homophobe. It won't call the so-called Australian Family Association's strident opposition to gay marriage, adoption, IVF and pretty much the entire existence of anyone with same-sex attraction homophobic. I could go on. There are just so many examples of genuinely harmful anti-gay views in our society that I really resent the media using something like this as a distraction. Especially when the media is a big part of the problem. They treat views like those of Tony Abbott and the AFA as legitimate, their anti-gay sentiments as part of a 'debate'. It's bullshit. There is no 'debate'.

So, a little bit of understandable schadenfreude from the ordinary person aside, leave Steph Rice the hell alone. Once society is rid of genuine homophobia and anti-gay views, the little things like using the word 'faggot' in stupid schoolyard language will naturally follow. But something like this should never be allowed to divert peoples' attention from the real issues, especially when the diversion is created by people who bear a lot of responsibility for the climate that exists in the first place.

Update: Matthew Mitcham's defence of Stephanie Rice has hit the news. He essentially said the same thing yesterday on Facebook, but I suppose Ian Roberts' attention-seeking better fitted the media's desired narrative.

Tuesday, September 07, 2010

Australia just dodged a bullet.

We were *this* close to having a Tony Abbott government. I felt sick just thinking of it. Thank god Rob Oakeshott and Tony Windsor opted to back Labor. The Mad Katter didn't, but regardless I enjoyed the spectacle he provided and appreciated that he is at least openly and honestly representing his electorate. I think Bob Katter holds some absolutely loony views, but he's not a slimeball. I even hated listening to Julia Gillard's press conference this afternoon, so refreshing has the straight-shooting, spin-free style of the four independents and Greens' Adam Bandt been.

Hopefully politics in Australia is not business as usual from now on.

Still expanding my food horizons

Recently I had the opportunity to try a bunch of new and  interesting cheeses when we held a cheese and beer-tasting night- two such nights, in fact, as we had so much leftover cheese and beer from the first. I thought I'd have a bit of a blog some of my more interesting discoveries.

Chocolate stout: I am a big fan of dark beers- stouts, rich, sweet trappist beers and the like. I've always wanted to try chocolate stout and oatmeal stout. I wasn't able to find oatmeal stout, but I did find a decent-sized bottle of Young's Double Chocolate Stout; A friend of ours was obviously of the same mind, as she brought alone the same thing! As it turned out, it was both delicious and chocolatey, but not in a sweet way. More like a stout with definite notes of cocoa; it was a perfect foil to some of the stinky washed-rind cheeses we had (and in the case of the munster, an absolute necessity). That same friend and her partner also brought along a Red Oak 'belgian chocolate stout' that is still sitting in our fridge, but given how good the other Red Oak beers were, I'm betting it's at least as good as the Young's, possibly better.

Saint Marcellin: A washed-rind cheese that attracted my attention because it came in its own little terracotta pot. It was the last one in stock and I snapped it up. It was extraordinarily soft when I bought it and on the night, a week later, it was the consistency of pouring cream- the terracotta pot is functional, rather than simply decorative or kitsch. It was an incredible cheese. Just beautiful. So good, in fact, that for the second beer-and-cheese night I couldn't resist buying another when I saw that Superior Fruit had restocked it. It was slightly less ripe, but I figured within a week it would have ripened sufficiently. What a nasty shock I got. A friend who'd enjoyed the first one at the previous beer-and-cheese night tried it first and warned me that it was nowhere near as good. Boy was that an understatement. It literally tasted like vomit. "Not to worry!", I thought, "I'll just pop it in the fridge for a couple of weeks to ripen up more, then I'll enjoy it. And it did ripen somewhat over the next two weeks, so I tried it. Still tasted like vomit. Another week later, it was significantly softer still- and still tasted like vomit. To the point where I immediately had to search for something strong-tasting to rid my mouth of the taste! I was so put off by the experience that I seriously considered throwing out the rest of the cheese (heresy!). So Saint Marcellin would have to be both one of the nicest and most revolting cheeses I have ever tasted! Nothing like a Camembert or Brie which, if underripe, are boring and chalky at worst. When underripe, Saint Marcellin is seriously offensive stuff!

Munster: I had great hopes for the Munster. "Let us know how you go with that one", said the guys at Superior Fruit. They'd only just got it in stock for the first time when we were about to hold our second beer-and-cheese night. By the time we got home, Gam was complaining that the Munster had stunk out the car. After a few minutes in the house, he was complaining about the stench in there, too! He grabbed a ziploc bag and sealed the Munster safely inside, but in the few days it was in the fridge its smell had permeated the plastic and it was busy stinking up the fridge. A good sign, I thought! I knew it probably wasn't going to be to the taste of most of our friends, but I was convinced that our friend Rob, a chef, food technologist and adventurous food-enthusiast, would appreciate it.

When I unpackaged the Munster it was fairly soft and a small chunk of cheese adhered to the packaging, so I ate it. Boy was it strong. It was a great flavour, but with a hell of a strong aftertaste. I immediately felt the need for a swig of something strongly flavoured, and the chocolate stout fitted the bill perfectly, and actually worked brilliantly with the cheese. I later tried it with the blue-label Chimay and a couple of other dark beers, but none matched it so well as the chocolate stout. Pretty much everyone tried the Munster, and pretty much no-one went back for seconds. Rob was sitting at the table close to the Munster, and periodically he would jerk his head back and lean back from the table. After the second or third time it happened I realised that it was the scent of the Munster assaulting his nostrils! He laughed and admitted the smell was just too much, and moved the cheese out of the way. He had a French friend who loved really stinky cheese, he said, but the Munster was a bridge too far for him and I was definitely on my own with this one!

Tete de Moine: This was Gam's pick for the first night, and as it was sold only in an 800g wheel, it lasted through til the second and is still being consumed even now! Of all the cheeses we bought and tried, this is the one I would want to buy again, even in spite of the eye-watering price ($75!). It is a simply brilliant, big, beautiful cheese. It's a hard Swiss cheese, made from unpasteurised cow's milk. When first unwrapped it had an eye-wateringly pungent ammonia smell, but left to breathe it revealed real character, and the ammonia smell largely disappeared. It is supposed to be shaved with a special gadget, with the finest curls of cheese supposed to develop the flavour to the cheese's fullest potential, but we didn't have one... I use a fruit peeler or a very sharp knife. I've been eating it most days since then, and it's particularly good with vegetables. I eat shavings of it rolled up in lettuce leaves as a snack or for lunch, and tonight I had it melted on steamed cauliflower. Gam reckons it would be a great cheese to have on a burger and I agree, but we haven't got around to making burgers yet.

Roquefort with strawberries: this was a recommendation from my friend and fellow nutritionist, Rob's partner Nicole. I was sceptical. I love blue cheese, and the roquefort from Superior Fruit was a particularly good one, but I know that blue cheese can make certain other foods taste simply foul, so I approached this combination with extreme caution. Blue cheese and celery, yes... but blue cheese and strawberries? Well, it worked! It totally worked! It was so delicious I went back for seconds, and thirds. Definitely worth a go. It sounds adventurous, but it's shocking how well they go together- nothing 'out there', nothing to stretch the tolerance of your taste-buds, just your imagination.

Big props to Superior Fruit for having the most fabulous and interesting selection of quality cheeses I have ever come across. Superior Fruit makes all my cheese dreams come true. I don't know how we didn't discover them earlier. We used to drive by their sign advertising their 'cheese room' when I was pregnant and didn't visit because Gam knew I would go nuts and buy all sorts of cheeses I wasn't supposed to have. It's an all-round great, friendly, family-run deli. Their fruit and vegetables really are superior, too! I said to Gam that the only way it could be more perfect was if they opened 'Superior Bottlestore' right next door so we didn't have to drive so far for a quality selection of beers.

Re beers, First Choice now have a pathetic selection of interesting beers, as we sadly discovered after trekking all the way to Toowong (our old 'local') after figuring maybe our new local at Salisbury just wasn't up to scratch. No, First Choice just isn't up to scratch. Luckily we found Wine@era, who apparently have a great selection of wine, but we went for their selection of beers and weren't disappointed.

Monday, September 06, 2010

Hitting karma's sweet spot: Fred Nile's porn 'research'.


Seeing as I'll probably never get around to blogging about it myself, I would just like to highlight the recent, juicy and thoroughly enjoyable spectacle of Fred Nile's did-he-or-didn't-he office porn scandal. And come on, most of us can muster up enough common sense to agree on this one. Mikey made a great post about it, and revelled appropriately in Nile's most discomforting moment in the spotlight. A more deserving person, I cannot think of one.

Grr. Mastitis? Hopefully not.

I'm really hoping I don't have mastitis again. I still haven't posted something I wrote while I had it when Setri was 3 weeks old, but it was horrible. I have a kind of bruised feeling on my left boob and I can see a pink patch... and now, after 2 and a half hours of trying to settle a rather manic (but thankfully not screaming) Setri, I have one heck of a headache. No fever though. That was the real kicker last time. The pain was bad, but the fever was debilitating. *So* hoping it's not mastitis.

Friday, September 03, 2010

A great week for Setri-watching

He made some pretty determined efforts to crawl on one occasion last week, but only managed to shuffle backwards!

I think Setri must be having a developmental growth-spurt this week. He's started doing all sorts of things.


On Monday it was sitting up by himself for a prolonged period;


On Tuesday I noticed him banging a slotted spoon I'd given him to play with on the 'bongo'/footstool while he was in his Jolly Jumper- he subsequently copied me when I banged my hand on the bongo like it was a drum, then repeated the action later when I wanted to show Gam.

Wednesday, standing on the lounge and holding onto the back, he tried 'cruising' for the first time, although I grabbed him around the hips when I saw what he was doing, so he shuffled to the edge with me holding on to him (and just as well I did, because he apparently wanted to get to the colourful shopping bags on the floor, and pretty much tried to dive off the lounge... obviously still hasn't learned what the consequences of falling are!).

Also on Wednesday, Setri managed to crawl for the first time, rather than face-ploughing. Only problem was, he wound up going backwards! I think because he was pushing back with his arms. It was only for a few 'steps' before he realised he wasn't getting any closer to where he wanted to go (the remote control for the TV), and started whinging and doing his landed-fish impression (balancing on his belly and flapping his arms and legs).

Then, this morning, Friday, Setri actually managed to crawl forwards for 2 'steps' by himself. It wasn't very good- his back sagged in the middle, but he was otherwise in proper crawling position and propelled himself forward, so it's a start. He hasn't been able to repeat it, but he has been crawling backwards with increasing surety. The problem for him is that the times he's done it, his intention has been to move forwards. So he is winding up very frustrated. He's pretty proficient at face-ploughing now, too, but that only works on the bed or soft surfaces, not the wooden floor!

One more thing he's been doing lots of this week- although he'd done it on the odd occasion over the last few weeks- is a great big baby chuckle. God it's adorable :)

Monday, August 30, 2010

A day of firsts for Setri

Photo taken over the weekend (19 weeks old) of Setri engaged in normal hand-biting, as opposed to angry hand-biting!

Today we had three firsts.

1. Our first real poo-disaster. Too long and disgusting a story to go into in what's supposed to be a short post!

2. Setri was able to sit upright and play by himself in his cot for the first time while I cleaned up said poo-disaster (he's been showing signs of being very close to developing the ability to sit upright unsupported for longer periods, just lately, but today was the first time he got there).

3. I'm 99% sure Setri just had a violent tantrum when I put a jumpsuit on him after giving him a bath... I think he tried to actually grab and bite me in an aggressive way (not that he doesn't already bite me quite hard with his gums sometimes, but this time it actually seemed like he was trying to attack me, it was a bit freaky).

One out of three makes it sound like a terrible day, but it was really pretty damn good. Babies take up a lot of time, but they sure are delightful little things... even if they're potentially trying to cause you grievous bodily harm :)

Friday, August 27, 2010

Abbott angles for a return to the polls.

Here's a pretty good view from the SMH's Lenore Taylor of the latest on the 2010 federal election outcome. Tony Abbott is giving the finger to the independents in the hope of pushing them towards another election rather than having to play nice and make a deal for minority government.

I hope Tony loses at his game, because I think for once Australia might've got the government we deserve, or at least given the big parties what they deserve. And I shudder at the idea of an Abbott government. The 'political love-child' of John Howard should never be allowed to take this country back to the dark ages.

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Setri discovers food



A couple of weeks ago I had been eating some chocolate when Setri decided he wanted to chew on my hand. He does that a lot these days- he's got a heck of a bite even with no teeth! I must've had a smear of chocolate on my finger, because he quickly switched from biting to sucking, leaving my finger covered in drool.

That moment it was like a switch was thrown and Setri realised that the things I hold in my hand and put in my mouth taste GOOD. Ever since, he's been grabbing at my hand every time I eat something, and when that fails, grabbing at food on my plate.
 
Given that he was only 3 and a half months old when this sudden interest in food developed, I was a little bit thrown on what to do. After all, current recommendations in Australia are that babies are exclusively breastfed to 6 months. Bigger babies are often (against recommendations) started on solids earlier because their parents are convinced that breast milk 'isn't enough', but Setri went from 5.44kg to 9.5kg in the space of 3 and a half months on breast milk alone, so it's pretty obvious that that's untrue. I always said that if Setri showed signs of being developmentally ready for solid foods earlier than 6 months we would start 'baby-led weaning', but I wasn't about to start solids before 4 months. I honestly didn't think he'd start to show an interest until around 5 months. There's some evidence for introducing certain foods prior to 6 months (as well as evidence suggesting that it can be detrimental to start certain foods later than 6 months), but introducing them prior to 4 months can be harmful, as the infant's gut really isn't mature enough for substances other than breast milk. Telling that to Setri was a bit hard, though!


 This worked really well to entertain him at first but now just makes him frustrated- giving him bits of food that are too hard to bite pieces off, so he can gum and taste them.

We decided rather than persist with me having to eat while Setri was asleep or hand him over to Gam every time I wanted to eat something so Setri didn't get jealous, we would give him bits of food that he could taste but not swallow- bits of vegetable or meat or toast he could stick in his mouth. So far that has been a great success- turns out there is nothing that entertains Setri more than a piece of food! We have also given him a spoon so he can 'feed' himself- as far as I can tell, he thinks the spoon is made of food, or automatically produces food, but he happily grabs the handle and sticks the spoon in his mouth to taste whatever is on it.

At some point Setri also sussed out that drinking is just like eating, only you do it from a cup, and that when I drink from a cup I am also imbibing interesting substances. So whenever I get myself a glass of water while holding Setri these days he inevitably starts licking his lips, leaning towards the glass, trying to grab the glass and tilt it to his mouth, and if that fails, coughing irritably to let me know he wants what I'm having! He's naturally quite good at drinking from a cup, it turns out, and seeing as he drinks shower water I didn't see a problem with also letting him have sips of water from my glass. When I hold it up for him, he places his hand underneath the glass to tilt it towards his mouth. I do have to pay careful attention that he doesn't just jerk his hand and slosh it down his throat, mind, it's not as if his motor skills are so fabulous he can really do it by himself.

Problem is although I drink almost nothing but water, I do have a cup of coffee every morning. Now Setri is up more in the mornings, he's around when I have my coffee. I don't drink it hot enough to burn him, but a few days ago I got myself a coffee and he leaned in towards the cup, lips puckered... I thought I'd give him a smell of the coffee and it would put him off for sure, but nooo. Then I thought I'd let him put his mouth on the edge of the cup and taste the coffee residue, and that would deter him. Oh no it didn't! He grabbed the cup and tilted it and tried to drink the coffee! Thankfully the cup was fairly close to being empty. I had planned on drawing the line at coffee, but on the weekend he tried it again and so Gam and I decided to let him have a sip of coffee, figuring he'd hate it and would stop trying to drink it. Well, that didn't work either. He took a big sip and was readying himself for another slurp when I pulled the cup away. Maybe I should've made it black!

It was right about 4 months that Setri really started trying to use his gums to bite the food as part of his eating, instead of predominantly attempting to suck bits off it.

Since he hit 4 months the week before last we've been giving him things that he can eat a little of- cooked pumpkin, sweet potato, brown rice, fresh date, ripe kiwifruit, cooked apple, ripe pear. And I *may* have let Setri have a taste of some different kinds of gelato on the weekend, after we bought a big tub with 4 flavours (ferrero rocher, earl grey, pineapple & mint and passionfruit) from Gelateria Cremona on the weekend...



My parents would be appalled. They think that if he tastes anything sweet he will refuse all non-sweet foods forever more, and that I shouldn't feed him anything sweet for the first couple of years, but I think it's ok to expect Setri to share whatever we're eating, within reason. I let him taste some hot and spicy tomato-based sauce already (he loved it the first time, and the second time he got a bit overzealous trying to stuff a sauce-covered piece of lamb into his mouth, got sauce all over his face and started crying- which was cured instantaneously with an offer of boob), so if I'm letting him try the hard stuff he may as well be allowed the nice easy stuff too, I reckon. Setri loved the gelato. I only let him have a tiny smidge of each on the fluoro plastic gelato spoon, and while he was shocked by the cold temperature, he evidently loved the taste. He also loved the spoon and wouldn't let go of it for ages.

 Eating a little bit of roughly pureed brown rice.

I figure if he has the motor skills to feed himself at this stage, he's probably ok ingesting a little food. We'd always intended to do baby-led weaning anyway- developmentally it's probably better for him to be feeding himself than having bland pap shoved down his throat, and Setri seems happiest shovelling food into his own mouth! Dare I say it, I'm not even sure boob is his favourite thing any more...

Sunday, August 22, 2010

2010 election night wrap-up.

There is no result from the federal election tonight, and it looks like whoever forms government will form a minority government. We are perilously close to seeing a return of John Howard in the form of Tony Abbott. "The Coalition is back in business", he said tonight. Maxine McKew lost in John Howard's former seat of Bennelong.

Gam and I are joining the Greens tonight and are going to contribute our energies to our local branch. We don't want Setri growing up under the zombie corpse of John Howard or the kind of Labor government we've seen in the past few months. Neither of them deserve to run the country.

There are some, few, bright spots tonight.

Family First senator Steve Fielding has lost his seat. Australia had the Labor brains trust responsible for our current mess to thank for his presence in the first place. Seriously, fuck those guys.

Wilson Tuckey, that despicable old redneck from WA, has been turfed out of his seat. Thank god for small mercies.

The Greens look like they may have done even better than securing a senate spot in Queensland. They may have secured a second seat in SA and one in WA, giving them up to 8 seats in the senate. Let's hope they pull through and get them all, for the sake of all that is good about Australia.

Friday, August 20, 2010

Setri at 4 months

Setri still pretty much hates the camera. 17 weeks old.

He can scratch his head.

He can scratch his balls.

He's growing up *sniff*

Apart from growing from a giant of a newborn into a giant of a 4-month-old, what has Setri been up to lately?


Only a little too big for the bathroom sink... 16 weeks.

Sleep:


He has started sleeping a bit less, for one. Where I used to get him up for a nappy change in the morning and he would immediately go straight back to sleep for a couple of hours, now he stays up for a while first. In the last couple of weeks his daytime naps have shortened to around 40 minutes, with an interval of an hour and a half to 2 hours before he starts to get twitchy and tired. Between 3 and 4 months there were a couple of weeks where he was very restless at around 2am in the morning and gave us a run of sleep deprivation, but thankfully that seems to have stopped. Lately he has been waking me up at around 6am by wriggling in his sleep and whinging (he is still in our bed) because he needs to poo.

He still (I don't know if I've mentioned this before) does his 'face-swiping', tossing and turning, wiping his face from side to side on the mattress before finally falling asleep. If we put him down and he starts face-swiping immediately it's usually a sign that he will go to sleep without too much fuss. Some babies suck their thumbs, Setri face-swipes.




15 weeks and really turning on the charm for the camera... not!


Nappy changing:


Setri generally goes for at least 16 hours overnight without pooing and makes, on average, 2 pooey nappies a day. Sometimes only 1, sometimes 3 or more, but the one in the morning is always biggest.

A few weeks ago he developed nappy rash for the first time and it has been a real battle to get rid of it. It doesn't seem to bother him, except that he reflexively scratches the area with his right hand whenever his nappy comes off. Over the last week or so we have been leaving his nappy off whenever he is awake, and that seems to have helped a lot. It also means I've been weed on a lot, but it's worth it to clear up the nappy rash. We apply walnut oil followed by sorbolene at every nappy change, and we've always bathed him in clean water after every poo, using cetaphil where necessary.




Nappy-free tummy time, 17 weeks.

Physical:


We bought him a Jolly Jumper, which he really enjoys. He seems to believe he can walk and that the harness is preventing him from going where he wants, however. He loves to 'dance' to music while in it, and generally just jump around. It also allows him to play with objects if I put our 'bongo' footrest/pouf thingy in front of him and allow him to use it as a table. He does get frustrated if he drops something, however, as he is unable to bend down and pick it up.

I wasn't imagining things, he really is learning to wave! Admittedly he only does it to himself/me in the mirror and won't do it for other people (he has waved to Gam once). It's not really a wave of the hand, more of a jerky up-and-down movement of the arm from the shoulder, but it is consistently in response to my saying 'hello!' and waving at him in the mirror.

He rolls over all he time, seemingly for entertainment rather than by accident. He's still better at rolling from back to front than front to back, but he always rolls over from his left to right. He doesn't use rolling as a means of transport, as I've heard of some babies doing.

He still generally hates tummy time and gets frustrated when he tries to crawl... this generally culminates in a tanty-ish bout of whinging until he gets picked up.

When Setri was 3 and a half months old we went to dinner at my cousin Rachelle's place for her birthday. Her husband's cousin and his wife were there too, with their 6 month old baby, Leonard. Baby Len was born at over 4kg, and at 6 months weighed 8-point-something kilos- about average for his age, I think. Setri was as big as baby Len (although his head was a bit smaller), and quite a lot heavier. When we handed Setri over to Mami (Len's lightly-built Japanese mother) for a cuddle, her eyes grew wide and she gasped with surprise and said "Len's not heavy! I'll never complain again!"! In terms of his physical abilities, Len was a little bit ahead of Setri- able to do a mini-crunch to raise his head up from the floor while lying on his back was one I remember, but not much. Socially, Setri wasn't on a par with Len, who engaged every person in the room with eye contact when he entered, and seemed a little bit friendlier with strangers.





Setri really enjoys his piano time, although sometimes he prefers to listen to me play or press the 'demo' button and listen to the recorded music while all the buttons light up! 16 weeks.


Interactions and communication:
 
He is happier to be on his own for longer periods. Gam built him a mobile that we hung a couple of toys off, and that keeps him fairly entertained for 5-10 minute periods.

I'm still not sure whether his 'kischkisch' noise really does mean 'kisskiss', as he doesn't say it consistently. He does, however, understand the word 'kiss', as whenever I say it he puts on his 'kiss face' (lean forward, mouth open). He also puts on his 'kiss face' when he wants to receive a kiss and no-one has yet offered (usually Gam!).

He also definitely understands the word 'up', and probably the word 'down' (although I'm worried he only understands it when I say 'downdown'), and he demonstrates this by consistently standing up when I say this to him as he's sitting on my lap. I'm not sure whether his occasional failure to sit down when I say 'down' is because he doesn't understand or because he is so proud of standing up that he doesn't *want* to sit down!

In terms of his speech development, we've noticed that now when he learns how to make a new noise he goes on a jag of using it endlessly for a couple of days. First his 'psycho laugh/squeal', then bird-call-like noises... the latest is a lip-puckered farty noise (he is particularly delighted when I reply by making the same farty noise in return) and a 'bu' sound. Some noises stick around, though. When Setri is over-tired or angry he makes his 'angry trill', a kind of 'drrrrrr' noise... he no longer does his 'ack' when he doesn't like something- instead it's 'drrr drrrr'.

Setri now greets Gam with a smile when he gets home from work, and waves both arms at him when he wants Gam to take him from me and play with him.

He now loves even more the games where he physically gets moved around. Whether it's 'flying' from the bathroom sink to the nappy change table, being 'dropped' onto the bed from a low height, being pulled back and forth by his arms for kisses while standing on our laps, or being pulled across the bed by his legs while lying on his back, he puts on the most massive ear-to-ear grin splitting his face in half, the riskier the activity, the bigger the grin.


Food is Setri's favourite entertainment, lately. 16 weeks.

Feeding:

See here for a longer post on how Setri decided at 3.5 months of age that he should be eating what we're eating, and how we are dealing with it.

Setri is capable of going 4-5 hours during the day without a breastfeed, but when he does so he tends to feed more during the night. I tend to feed him twice every waking cycle during the day, which means either two boobs or three (feeding on one side more than once- as much as Setri would love that 3-breasted Martian chick from Total Recall to be his mother, he's stuck with a 2-breasted version). I always feed him when putting him down for a nap because I made the mistake a few times of putting him down for a nap, having fed him a little earlier while he was awake, only to find he just wouldn't sleep, and it was because he was hungry. I guess while we're now introducing him to foods it's not like 'real food' forms any significant proportion of his diet (<1% if I had to guess), so he's pretty much still exclusively getting his nutrients from breast milk. Supporting a rapidly-growing nearly-10kg body on breast milk alone means he drinks a lot and drinks often! Even though he sleeps right next to me in bed he often doesn't feed at all during the night, meaning my boobs are very full and uncomfortable in the morning... sometimes I'll kind of prod him into having a feed while he's asleep, but when he's asleep he'll only take one side before pulling off and falling into a deep sleep again, meaning that when I get him up in the morning I'm usually dripping or spraying milk everywhere from the side that he didn't drain! I still have to sleep on a towel, plus keep a supply of 'boob towels' next to the bed.

Since he hit 4 months we've been allowing Setri to even eat some foods, where he is able to feed himself. He was a big fan of the ripe pear. 18 weeks.


Yeah... 4 months. It's amazing watching a little person develop :)

Ignoring the contradictions: Election Journalism 101



From The Australian this morning;

While Labor has attempted to separate the population issue from immigration policy, despite overseas migration accounting for about two-thirds of population growth, the Coalition has not been as shy. It proposes to cap immigration at 170,000 a year as part of its effort to ensure Australia does not reach Treasury's projected population of 36 million by 2050.

Argh!!!! One of the things that has annoyed me most during this federal election is the failure of the media to force Tony Abbott to reconcile his scaremongering on population growth with his open support for increasing the 'Australian' (*insert dogwhistle noise*) birthrate. Honestly, does any media organisation employ any actual journalists these days, or just propagandising stooges? There is a very simple, very obvious question to be asked of Tony Abbott here, and NO-ONE is asking it.

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

5 years of blogging

Ah we've just passed our 5 year bloggiversary. Sure things have slowed down a bit in terms of posting, but we're still here. Go us :-D

Dear Electrolux

Today is our 8 week anniversary of having no oven. The element in our 8 month old Westinghouse oven died 8 weeks ago and it should have been a simple matter to have it fixed. First we had to wait a week to be seen by a technician. Fine. Then it was going to be another week until he could bring a part to fix the oven- 2 weeks. We weren't particularly happy at the thought of going 2 weeks without an oven, but accepted that that was the best the Electrolux technician could do. Then we were sent a message saying that there were no parts available and the oven would probably be fixed in early August- 6-7 weeks without an oven. Needless to say, this was an extraordinary inconvenience. Last week, not having heard from anyone at Electrolux, I phoned to find out what was going on. Our oven would probably be fixed the next week, I was told.

Yesterday I was finally contacted by someone from Electrolux. Someone would be around to fix our oven the next day, i.e. today. Then, after 1pm today I received another phone call. Our element had not arrived, the technician had been forced to travel back to the depot to check where it was and it hadn't been delivered. I was told they will wait for tomorrow's delivery to see if it arrives, and they tentatively rescheduled the repair of our oven for Friday. You will understand that I'm not going to hold my breath for that to happen.

I would like this complaint to be passed to someone higher up at Electrolux than the customer service department. I'm probably beyond pacifying. I think, barring some extraordinary grovelling on the part of Electrolux, it's safe to say that my husband and I will never again purchase any Electrolux-branded products. I would like to remind the relevant people also that we have had 8 long weeks in which to complain to *everyone we know* about our lack of a working oven and our dissatisfaction with Electrolux. 8 weeks in which to urge people to think twice before buying any Electrolux products.

However, I would like to provide some helpful tips for Electrolux to avert this kind of customer service disaster in the future.

1. COMMUNICATE. If there is going to be a problem with speedily fixing an essential household appliance, whether it be an oven, a refrigerator, a dishwasher or a vacuum cleaner, don't just leave the customer hanging. Provide regular updates. Explain the reason for the delay. Offer to call or email the customer on a weekly or fortnightly basis to let them know how things are progressing and the projected date for having things fixed. It costs next to nothing and reassures the customer that something is actually being done.

2. APOLOGISE. If it looks like it's going to take what might reasonably be viewed as an unacceptable amount of time for having an appliance repaired, for heavens sake pretend you care. This goes double for appliances that are still under warranty, or it just looks like you *know* the product you're selling is dodgy and it comes as no surprise to you that it's carked it within the warranty product. Let the customer know that you're sorry that the breakdown of their essential appliance has caused them inconvenience, that you *pride yourselves* on a quality product and that you are doing your utmost to fix the problem in a timely fashion. Even if you're lying, at least you've gone to the trouble of pretending, and this will mollify a large proportion of potentially-pissed-off customers.

Sometimes things *do* take time, and most reasonable customers will accept this, if you take the time to apologise for the delay and explain what's going on.

I sincerely hope that my suggestions will be noted and applied, in order that Electrolux doesn't lose too many more customers through simple customer service negligence.


Kind Regards,

Sarah

Thursday, August 12, 2010

The birth of Setriakor: Day 4



At 6am I awoke and showered, then expressed again, sitting my specimen jar on my breakfast tray. I filled that jar with colostrum and went to the ward reception for some labels before returning and starting on a second jar.

Gam arrived and I showered. My milk was coming in- my boobs were visibly larger than they had been the night before. And sore. To my relief, my belly had also shrunk some more; the day after the birth I looked like a woman who was 6 months pregnant. Now I looked... maybe 3 or 4 months pregnant. After my shower the new midwife on duty stopped by, asking about my bleeding, whether I needed any pain relief, and whether I'd managed to 'move my bowels' since the birth.

I hadn't, I told her. Was there something I could take that would help? She offered Metamucil, a laxative tablet or Microlax. Microlax sounded the most appropriate- my fibre intake was fine and I didn't anticipate any problems once I had successfully been to the toilet for the first time. When the midwife returned she handed me the little bottle of Microlax and instructed me on how to use it: lubricate nozzle with the little sachet of lube, insert nozzle up bottom, squeeze bottle, then wait in proximity to bathroom because the urge to poo will hit suddenly!

In the bathroom, having followed the instructions I discovered that the Microlax seemed to act basically as an irritant, and had the urge to expel it straight away- it burned! I tried to hold on until it seemed to be working properly, then I had an urge to push, disconcertingly like those I experienced during labour. Soon I had my relief, with no ill-effects for my poor bruised pelvic floor. The experience pretty much confirmed that my inability to 'go' had been psychological and when the midwife came around again I told her as much. “That's pretty common!”, she laughed.

That midwife took an interest in us and took time to talk to us- and listen to our story so far. Aspects of it clearly concerned her, though we had not told her anything beyond the first doctor's inappropriate inquiry about vaccinations, omitting the patient-confusion episode and the second doctor's implied threat to remove Setri from our custody. Mostly because I found hard enough to get the rest out without my voice breaking without having to address the most traumatic aspects of what happened the night before.

Gam and I went again to Special Care. We were the parents of 'the big baby'. It was now over 24 hours since either of us had been allowed to hold Setri. One of the nurses was just finishing her shift. “He was just distraught last night”, she told us. “He just wouldn't settle, so I got him out for a little cuddle”. No surprises, Setri had settled really well after that. “Thank you”, I said to the nurse. I felt sick. I was torn between a feeling of extreme gratitude that Setri had had some human contact, which he so clearly needed, and a sheer seething hatred of everyone in the nursery who had conspire to stop me from holding him in my arms. That wasn't the nurses fault, I thought. But why hadn't they called me if he needed a cuddle? I hadn't been allowed to hold him for more than 24 hours. Why hadn't the nurse called me to settle Setri? My heart broke, but I settled on being thankful that at least Setri had had a cuddle from someone. That, more than anything, was what he needed. Not the drip, not the wires, not the isolette.


It seemed as if the nursery now had some inkling of how disgruntled we were- maybe word was starting to get around- as they had arranged for some middle-aged head nurse to speak to us about how important it was that Setri continue to be nil-by-mouth. Unlike the other nurses actually working in the nursery, she seemed to be a direct mouthpiece for the doctors. They wanted to put in a nasogastric tube to feed him.

They wanted to what?

No way, Gam and I said. Setri should be allowed to breastfeed. He had been breastfeeding fine before being admitted to Special Care. If they were going to assert that he couldn't tolerate a feed, then they should conduct a trial feed to see if that was actually true. Let us feed him here, we argued, while he's hooked up to the monitor, and see for yourselves whether his oxygen saturation drops while he's feeding.

No, the nurse said. “We don't know how he'll tolerate a feed”. He could tolerate a feed, we again replied, wondering how many times we had to say that he was feeding fine before they took him. He had been feeding well, he had been making a normal number of wet nappies and he had pooed.

“Yes, but we don't know how much he'll be getting,” she said. That was easy, we replied. There are numerous ways to determine that, from weighing an infant before and after a feed, to feeding them the expressed milk in a bottle and measuring the volume taken.

“We don't know how he'll tolerate a feed”, the nurse said again. Was I imagining things, or didn't we just go over this?, I wondered. Gam and I repeated what we had said earlier- that Setri had been feeding just fine until someone decided that he wasn't allowed to. Again she ignored this fact, repeating that if he were allowed to breastfeed there was no way to determine how much milk he was getting. Trying to fob us off with a completely circular argument.


Then Gam asked about getting Setri out of the isolette and into a crib so we could have more contact with him. No, the nurse said, he couldn't cope with the crib, it was important that he remain in the isolette. I blinked incredulously, barely holding it together. What I had dismissed as paranoia was coming true: I had been offered the choice of crib or isolette and chosen the isolette because it was logistically easier for the nursery; now it was being used as 'evidence' that Setri was sick. Gam told the nurse we wanted to speak to the registrar. We would have to wait, we were told. After the head nurse left, one of the junior nurses tried to reassure us: nurse such-and-such was actually very pro-breastfeeding, it was just that she was worried for Setri's safety.

Gam and I conferred in hushed tones. I had been offered the choice of isolette or crib when Setri was admitted to the nursery, I reiterated to Gam. I had told him this the day before, when recounting the story of Setri's admission. Gam hadn't dismissed it as paranoia, telling me that we'd been through enough crap to justify the thought that someone might try and pull a trick like that. He was right.

Morning was the busiest period in the nursery and the place was getting full; opposite us were the family of a woman who'd given birth to twins, a boy and a girl. The little girl had just been placed in the isolette across from Setri's. The boy had died during the birth, prompting a poorly-handled exchange between the distraught sister of the mother, who had been present at the emergency caesarean birth, and the middle-aged matron- the smoker- who Gam and I had taken a dislike to. The aunt had come by Special Care to find out where her nephew's body was being kept - “looking for my nephew”, she said- and the nurse hadn't paid enough attention to realise that the naked little girl in the isolette in front of her was not a baby boy. The aunt angrily blurted out what had happened, and cursed the nurse for her mistake. The nurse was brusque and insensitive, verging on rude, in her reply. Sure, she couldn't have known that the newly admitted little girl had a dead twin, but someone with her experience should have known how to defuse the situation arising from her mistake. An apology would have been a good start. There was considerable irony in that Gam and I had just heard her talking to another nurse about being sent to a seminar designed to improve 'customer service' at the hospital. Next to them was the family of one of the tiny premie babies: the mother, who came in every day, twice a day to use the electric breast pump and have skin-to-skin contact with her little girl, and her parents; the grandparents who took turns proudly holding the baby, who was smaller than most dolls. Even the nurses marvelled at her size every time they retrieved her from the isolette for the mother. We weren't going to kick up a fuss and potentially distress other visitors even if we felt like it. But we were going to stand up for Setri, and stand up for ourselves. At least, that's what we told ourselves we would do.

No way were we going to consent to a nasogastric tube, Gam and I agreed. We were positively agog that it had come to this: a healthy baby with a history of uncomplicated breastfeeding had first been deprived of the breast and placed on a glucose drip; now they were about to start tube-feeding him on the premise that he couldn't possibly tolerate a breastfeed. It was impossible to believe that the people we were dealing with were medical professionals. Putting a nasogastric tube in Setri wasn't best practice, it wasn't a decision based on the best available evidence- there was not only no evidence to support it, the only available evidence was that Setri was perfectly capable of breastfeeding and tolerating oral feeds. The proposition was ridiculous. No way would we agree. No bloody way, we said to each other.

We were met by the registrar, to whom we expressed our unwillingness to agree to their wish to intubate Setri. We told her it was a bad decision, we told her that Setri was perfectly capable of feeding, that we wanted them to allow us to give him a trial feed while a doctor observed the monitor. Not possible, she said. She would get a more senior registrar to speak to us.

I had wanted to draw the Special Care doctors' attention to the fact that they as a team had left me completely without support to maintain my milk supply when they placed Setri on nil-by-mouth. I told the registrar that no-one had taken the time to speak to me about expressing when they had taken Setri off oral feeds. She would make sure someone talked to me about it, she assured me. I had been expressing, I told her. I wanted to tell her that wasn't the point. The point was the poor procedure, poor patient management, a failure to recognise the importance of breastfeeding. But I finally- inevitably- lost my composure and started crying. I apologised to the registrar, but I couldn't stop. Across the nursery, Setri was crying too. The registrar hurried across the nursery, saying something to the nurses about Setri and I both being very upset and that it was in the best interests of both of us that they get him out of the isolette so that I could hold him.

So Setri was placed in my arms.

Although I was wearing a gown, Setri pecked desperately at my chest, making little 'eh eh eh' noises, trying to find a breast, growing distraught again when he couldn't find a feed. I tearily apologised to him again and again, telling him in a whisper that I was so sorry, I wasn't allowed to feed him. I stroked his head and eventually he gave up and stopped crying, nestled in my arms. He had lost a noticeable amount of weight since the day before, and bore such an unhappy, weary look on his little face that it tore at my heart.

The more senior registrar came to talk to us about putting a nasogastric tube in Setri. He had been on a glucose drip for a significant proportion of his short life, she said. He really needed proper nutrition now or it would start to affect his growth. “What you're saying,” I said, getting teary again, “Is that he's getting malnourished and he needs breast milk”. The registrar agreed. “So why don't you let us feed him?”, Gam asked. “We don't know how he'll tolerate oral feeds”, the registrar replied. Without showing his perfectly justifiable frustration, Gam repeated that Setri had been tolerating oral feeds, he had been feeding well until they arbitrarily placed him nil-by-mouth, and what's more, on his previous admission to Special Care Setri had been breastfeeding while hooked up to those very same monitors and the breastfeeding had had no adverse impact on Setri's respiratory rate, heart rate or pulse oximetry. Which was why, he reiterated, Setri had been discharged to go upstairs with me in the first place. I was so grateful to have Gam do the talking for me. I was exhausted and emotional, and incapable of standing up for myself any longer. Gam was just as exhausted, but he fought for me.

To no avail. Our only options were that Setri stayed on the glucose drip or that we agreed to a nasogastric tube. It was effectively an ultimatum: either Setri stayed on the glucose drip and got malnourished or we let them intubate him and he would get breast milk fed into his stomach via a tube. I thought of all that colostrum sitting in the fridge. I thought of the adverse effects on Setri of him not getting colostrum, of not getting breast milk, of quickly becoming malnourished. And I cracked.

Gam looked at me. “What do you think?”. I looked up at him, still cradling Setri. I looked into his eyes. I couldn't look at the registrar. I couldn't address the registrar. “Maybe it's better that he gets something rather than nothing at all”, I said to Gam in a small voice, through tears. “Are you sure that's what you think?”, Gam asked. “I don't know,” I said. “They're not going to let us feed him. Maybe it's better than him getting malnourished”.

“If you're sure,” Gam said.

We weren't sure. We were painted into a corner. We know better now, but at the time the doctors portrayed our choice as being between us having a malnourished baby and us having a baby being fed via nasogastric tube. If we chose not to let them put a nasogastric tube in Setri, it was implied, it was our choice that was going to lead to Setri being malnourished, not something that the doctors did.

That was why we broke our resolve and agreed to the tube. We felt disgusted with ourselves, but there was no other choice, was there?

It was suggested by the registrar that we might want to leave while they carried out the intubation. It was Gam who said no. Gam's training as a speech pathologist meant he was familiar with the procedure and how it should be carried out, and he insisted on being there so he could ensure it was done properly. He offered to hold Setri down while it was done. He told me to stay seated and not to try and watch. It nearly killed me to hear what was happening to Setri, our beautiful little boy. Our healthy little boy for whom we consented to being subjected to an unnecessary and invasive medical procedure against our better judgement. It must have been a hundred times worse for Gam.

Tears were pouring down my face as I listened to Setri struggle against the nurse and against Gam as the tube was worked up his nose and down his throat. Visitors to the nursery were looking at me by this stage as I sobbed quietly next to Setri's isolette, but I didn't care. Setri's screams were muted as soon as the tube went down his throat, to a bizarre, strangled scream. It was as if he were in one of those nightmares were you try and scream for help but no sound will come out. His cry was quiet, hoarse and squeaky, but I could tell he was struggling with all his might.

Just when it sounded like Gam and the nurse had finished, Setri coughed up the tube.

Gam and the nurse were talking. There was no evidence of gastric aspirate on the end of the tube that had been fed into Setri's stomach- evidence to show that the tube had reached the correct destination instead of going into his lungs, where if a feed were directed it could kill him. Nevertheless they were both reasonably confident it had gone to the correct location before coming back up. They set about re-intubating Setri, who continued to struggle with all his might, his voice hoarse and terrified as he tried to scream. Just as it seemed all over, once again Setri coughed and coughed and worked the tube all the way back up his throat and into his mouth. I cried and cried and cried. I must have made things so hard for Gam.

“See that?”, Gam told the nurse. “There are two coils of tube right at the back of his pharynx. You tell me, if that had happened during a feed and no-one had noticed, that he wouldn't have aspirated.”

The nurse agreed. It was true. Giving Setri a nasogastric tube posed a very real risk of complications. Even death. If Setri was being fed via NG tube and coughed the tube up, the milk could end up in his lungs instead of his stomach. At best that would mean a lengthy stay in hospital; at worst it would mean he died- even very small amounts of feed aspirated into the lungs can result in aspiration pneumonia.

We were withdrawing consent for the nasogastric tube, Gam told the nurse. “And I want that noted in his file,” Gam said. “I want you to write it down now, while we're here.”

Setri lay still now, traumatised and exhausted, his breathing hoarse, ragged, his respiratory rate through the roof at around 120 breaths per minute. If there were concerns about his breathing before, the attempt to fit a nasogastric tube had made everything so much worse. Gam and I were instantly full of regret for consenting to the procedure. Bemused, too, at how easily we had been coerced into changing our minds and agreeing to it. It wasn't quite so elementary as that- Setri's life was at stake. His wellbeing, for which we, as his parents, were ultimately responsible, had been compromised. However much damage the hospital environment had done to him, we bore ultimate responsibility. We had let our baby down. We had allowed the doctors to order a procedure that we knew was against his best interests, that we knew was harmful. I felt beaten. Pathetic. How easily we had compromised ourselves, and our little boy's life. I was disgusted with myself. But even then I didn't stand up for myself; we had stopped the situation from deteriorating even further, but we hadn't improved anything. We resolved, at least, not to make the same mistake again.

We left Setri to rest.

Back in my room, Mum phoned. They were still in Walcha she said. I could hear the annoyance in her voice. Dad had wanted to wait until the stock market opened because he had some business to take care of. Mum told me they would be leaving very soon. After hanging up I joked to Gam that she would probably take the car and leave Dad in Walcha.

While in the Special Care Nursery, Gam had snuck a look at Setri's medical record and noted the reason for his first admission to the nursery on the night of his birth: Respiratory Distress Syndrome (thereafter abbreviated as RDS). We both knew that was a bullshit diagnosis. Thanks to my familiarity with the research literature on premature babies I was aware that it was extremely unlikely that Setri had RDS, for the simple fact that it is predominantly a disease that affects preterm babies. Sure, probably 99% of the infants who pass through Special Care are preterm and do have RDS , and therefore probably would've looked plausible in the stats for admission, but it obviously didn't apply to Setri as he had none of the key signs bar fast breathing- which can be a symptom of a whole host of things, or a symptom of nothing at all. The list of differential diagnoses had since been expanded, then nearly exhausted and was now well into the realm of the utterly implausible. When was one of these so-called doctors going to call a halt to the stupidity? Were they really so reluctant to make their own observations instead of acting solely on the dubious notes of the very first doctor to see Setri?

Karen, my midwife, dropped by my room to see how we were going. We told her that Setri was on nil-by-mouth and explained why we thought that decision was particularly stupid. I could tell she was inclined to agree, though she didn't say as much. When I told Karen that the hospital was trying to discharge me because I was not breastfeeding she seemed angry. “Don't you worry”, she told me. She would go and speak to some people and sort it out. I would not be going home while Setri was still in hospital. Karen knew as well as I did that once I was discharged, the chances of breastfeeding being resumed in a timely fashion- if at all- were greatly diminished. With the generally unsupportive attitude of the Special Care doctors towards breastfeeding, the prospect was even slimmer.

We spent a few hours in my room, Gam falling asleep once again on the bed while I read a book. The one positive aspect of being forced to spend the night without Setri is that no-one came around to hassle me and I had had a few hours of sleep under my belt. As poor-quality as it might have been, suffering constant interruptions from the ward noise, it was better than suffering the constant interference of overzealous midwives. That said, the previous night's midwife struck me as someone who would have been more respectful and inclined to listen to me; had she been rostered on the previous two nights we may not have wound up in that situation in the first place. I especially harboured a lot of ill feeling towards the midwife from the second night, the one who had brought the registrars. Without Setri to take care of, I had a lot of time to dwell on things.

Out of the blue a senior registrar from Special Care showed up in my room to discuss Setri's case. This was the first doctor, it seemed, who realised that we were both educated and medically literate and that fobbing us off like we were idiots was not going to help anyone. We had been there 4 days and she was the first doctor to take us seriously. The first doctor not to treat us like simpletons and attempt to scare us into agreeing to everything by trotting out the 'he could be about to die' line.

Where were they up to in terms of the differential diagnoses?, we wanted to know. They had ruled out all of the most likely (meconium aspiration syndrome, infection, pulmonary hypertension) and were now looking at things like heart defects and oesophageal fistula, she said. They had booked an ECHO with a cardiologist, she told us, hastening to add that there was no evidence at all of a heart defect. Oesophageal fistula was even more improbable, Gam pointed out. Gam, as a speech pathologist, knew that if there had been an oesophageal fistula we would have known about it well before this point, as Setri wouldn't have been able to tolerate any oral feeds whatsoever; there was nothing to indicate a fistula and the doctors were clearly grabbing at straws if they were seriously considering this as a diagnosis. He pointed this out to the doctor.

"Oh. That isn't in his records", she said, upon being informed that Setri had been breastfed right up until his second admission to Special Care. It wasn't in his records that he had been breastfed at all. That changed things somewhat, she said. They would meet tomorrow and give us an update on diagnosis. At this stage Setri was still to be hospitalised indefinitely and she could not give us a prospective release date. We still weren't to feed him, she said. After tomorrow's meeting, perhaps.


We visited Setri again. We would have gone earlier but we had to wait for the 'no-visiting hours' to be over- once again prevented from seeing him because we I was not breastfeeding him because they had stopped me from doing so. God that made me angry. Setri's breathing was still coarse and rattly from the trauma of the nasogastric tube. Gam reassured me that he was ok and that this was not indicative of any problem. His breathing was still faster than the normal rate of 40-60 breaths per minute; his blood oxygen saturation had dropped during the intubation, Gam told me. Thankfully, it was fine now. I wanted to get Setri out for a cuddle, while Gam thought it best that he be allowed to rest- he was still sleeping out of exhaustion from the effort of twice coughing up the tube.

Back at my room we waited for my parents. They rang for directions and Gam and I groused about my dad's refusal to buy a GPS. Gam kept watch on the traffic below from the window, eventually spotting their car.

Once my parents had made their way to my room we took them down to see Setri.pissed me off

“He's a perfectly healthy baby,” I told my mum. “Once you see him, you'll understand.”

And they did.



Setri looked more perfect than ever. The rattle had faded from his breath and he actually looked peaceful. He had chubby cheeks, good skin colour, and would have put any other newborn in the hospital to shame with his ruddy good health. But he was in an isolette and they weren't.

“Oh.” Mum said. “He's beautiful, isn't he?”, I said. “He's beautiful,” Mum echoed.

The registrars had ordered that an echocardiogram be carried out, and when we arrived the cardiologist was there with the large machine. He wouldn't be long, he told us. There was no hurry. Setri looked a lot happier than he had earlier, and we were happy just to gaze at him while the man finished his work. The registrars had admitted to Gam and I that there was absolutely nothing to indicate a heart problem, but it was clear that by this stage they had had to discard the more likely of the differential diagnoses and were grasping at straws. We were happy for the ECHO to be carried out, as it was not invasive. Unlike the drip, for which there was no indication, and the nasogastric tube, for which there was no indication either but which carried real risks.

The cardiologist told us “he's fine”, appearing somewhat puzzled as to why he had been asked to carry out the ECHO, and left. Now we could get Setri out of the isolette for his first cuddle from his grandparents.

At that point a nurse came over to tell us that we had too many visitors and one of us had to leave. We were puzzled- we only had 2 visitors. It turned out that we were all visitors. Even Gam and I, as Setri's parents, were considered visitors. Hadn't anyone informed us of the rules?, the nurse asked. There was an information booklet we were supposed to have been given upon Setri's admission, filled with rules and information. No-one had informed us of the existence of any such booklet, nor given us one. Gam said he would wait outside. Mum and Dad both offered to leave, but there didn't seem to be any point in that, seeing as we had brought them down to meet him for the first time. Still, Dad insisted, and left to wait outside the nursery until one of us came to swap places with him. Gam and I had brought Mum and Dad to see their first grandchild for the first time and now one of us was being kicked out. One more thing that we should have been able to do as a family, put paid to by the RBWH Special Care nursery. Somewhere Setri never should have been in the first place. My parents were starting to get the picture.

We asked to get Setri out of the isolette. “You hold him first. He'll want a feed,” she said. “They're not letting us feed him”, Gam and I said, almost in unison. “What?!” exclaimed Mum. “That's stupid!”.

When Gam passed Setri to me, Setri was clearly looking for a feed. He opened his mouth, puckered his lips and frantically pecked at my gowned chest. “Just feed him.”, Mum said, all her previous notions of strictly following doctors' orders now well and truly abandoned. “There's nothing wrong with him- look at him, he needs a feed!”.

It was heart-wrenching looking at Setri desperately searching for a feed. He'd lost a noticeable amount of weight since being taken away from me, and I nearly started crying again as it dawned on me just how much lighter he had become.



Gam and I had resolved that we would start feeding Setri again. We had decided to front up to the doctor and tell them that either they let us feed Setri in the Special Care nursery, in their presence, or we would discharge him and breastfeed him at home. It never occurred to us that we could do what Mum suggested and just ignore the nurses, forget about waiting for the doctors, and just give Setri what he needed. No, we told Mum, we were going to feed Setri, but not until we'd told the doctors about it. Lord knows why we didn't have enough guts to do what Mum would have done! Gam asked a nurse if we could see a registrar, but we were told they were busy and we'd have to see them later. So we held off feeding Setri. Weak.

Gam left the room so Dad could come back in. It felt so wrong, Gam having to leave and loiter in the corridor like some kind of stranger rather than the father of our baby. Mum sat down and I passed Setri into her arms. Her eyes shone with tears behind her glasses as she sat cradling Setri, who was now asleep. Tears came to my eyes, too. I knew how much Setri meant to her, how much she had looked forward to meeting him. He was beautiful, too. Not a fragile, pink newborn, more like a plump 3-month-old, and seemed obvious to all but the Special Care doctors that he was perfectly healthy.

Mum asked me to take some photos of her holding Setri on her mobile phone so she could show people. She was bursting with pride. It would be her 'GrannyBook', she said, the semi-computer-literate grandmother making a play on the concept of Facebook. While Dad and I struggled to figured out how to take photos with the mobile phone, I asked Gam to come back in for a minute with our camera so he could take some photos of Mum and Dad with Setri. I was going to leave so we wouldn't be breaking the rules, but Gam told me not to be silly. He took some photos of the three of us with Setri, plus some of Setri alone, snuggled in Mum's arms.



Mum left the room after that so Gam could come back in. Gam held Setri so he wouldn't get upset: every time I held him he ended up distraught because I couldn't (or wouldn't) feed him. Dad stayed behind and we talked briefly about what had happened up until that point, once again leaving out my experiences with the Special Care Nursery registrars. Gam and I told my parents that we planned to discharge Setri the next day (Friday) no matter what. We would have to get a doctor to sign off on his discharge, which probably wouldn't happen until at least late morning, we told them, so they may as well wait and visit us at home in the afternoon. Why we assumed after so much precedent that everything would finally go to plan, I don't know.

Mum and Dad were staying with my cousin Rachelle, so they left the hospital to drop off their luggage, planning to return some time after peak hour traffic had died down. Visitors were allowed to the Special Care Nursery at all hours of the evening, I told them, so we would take them down again to see Setri.

Gam and I went back to my room after that, but I don't remember anything that went on in that time. What happened next we both recall with great clarity.

Mum and Dad having returned to the hospital, we once again headed down to Special Care Nursery. There were new nurses on duty this time, and a new doctor- a male registrar this time.

Dad waited outside and Gam, Mum and I washed our hands and gowned up. The nurses greeted us and one suggested I have some skin-to-skin time with Setri. Seti immediately went crazy with his desire for milk, pecking at my chest and making 'ah ah ah' noises. I tried to sneak him down and cover him with the gown a bit so I could surreptiously feed him. “Put him up higher,” the nurse said, “otherwise it's like you're teasing him”. That nurse seemed bossy enough to kick up a fuss if I tried to feed Setri; most of the other nurses didn't even really seem to think Setri was sick and just carried out orders, but I had a feeling that the bossy one was one who liked to curry favour with the registrars.

“Just feed him,” my Mum said.

I felt all knotted up inside. I wanted to feed Setri right there. He was desperate for a feed. It had been over 36 hours since he had last had milk, and my colostrum and transition milk was nearly all gone, I was producing more mature milk. Setri had missed out on most of the colostrum. Despite being so distraught and angry about the situation and determined to give Setri what he needed, Gam and I still wanted to 'do the right thing' and discuss our plans with the doctors. If I had my time over I would say screw the doctors, screw being worried about what they thought of us. Doing the right thing would have meant feeding Setri a lot earlier and not allowing ourselves to be put off for 36 hours to the detriment of our son's health. We had confused doing what was proper with what was right. So I said to Mum that we would wait a few minutes until we had told the registrar on duty what we were doing. Besides, I was scared of the bossy nurse.

Gam cornered the registrar. Gam did all the talking, as I was very much on the edge, emotionally, and not up to arguing a point. More than ever, I was grateful that I had such a wonderful partner, and that Gam was able to be strong where I wasn't. I was effectively drained of all strength by that point. Drained by the sleep-deprivation, by my experience at the hands of the overzealous midwife and registrars during my second night in hospital. I just didn't have anything left. I was a weepy, worthless wreck. I shudder to think of what I would have allowed to be done to Setri and me after that point had Gam not been around to stand up for me. I am so grateful that Gam was there, and I am so thankful that he knew exactly what Setri and I needed and wanted, and fought hard for us.

Gam laid things out for the doctor. We were not prepared to wait until some undefined time the next day for any meetings or discussions with other doctors. Setri needed to be fed and we were either going to feed him in the nursery, where they could observe the feed and how Setri handled things, or we were going to take him home and feed him there. Flustered, the registrar spoke of oesophageal fistulas- the latest of the differential diagnoses- and danger and death. Gam repeated what he had said to the senior registrar earlier in the day: there was nothing to indicate a fistula and the doctors were clearly grabbing at straws if they were seriously considering this as a diagnosis. At that point the doctor received a call on his pager and told us “I have to attend an emergency caesarean. We'll continue this discussion when I get back.” I couldn't even look the doctor in the face, I was weeping the whole time. It was hard to muster any appearance of credibility when I was all too aware that in his eyes I was simply an ignorant new mother, and an obvious hormonal wreck.

Unsure of myself, I asked Gam whether that meant we'd have to wait for the doctor's return in order to breastfeed Setri.

“No,” Gam said. “We've done what we said we'd do, there's nothing more to be said. We're going to feed him.”

Thankfully, the bossy nurse had just finished her shift and left. The new nurses were more laid-back and less intimidating. I didn't feel scared of them.

Setri latched on with all the hunger and eagerness of a baby who had been starved for half of his short life. My mum beamed with relief. I whispered to Setri how sorry I was, how sorry I was that I had played a part in denying him what he needed. I couldn't believe I had held out for so long when feeding Setri was so obviously the right thing to do. I wasn't surprised that he could 'tolerate' the feed, that nothing bad happened. I felt deeply ashamed of myself for being so weak and putting our own need to be seen as responsible by the doctors ahead of Setri's need to be fed. Setri was content. He was getting what he needed for the first time in 2 days. It felt so right to be feeding him, and while I was still shedding tears, I felt that a massive weight had been lifted. I was unspeakably glad we had defied the doctors' orders.

The nurses saw everything that was going on. Gam told them we weren't going to wait to discuss anything else with the doctor. “I'll just record it as nuzzling, then”, one said, willing to turn a blind eye. I practically melted with gratitude at her reluctance to make a fuss over our refusal to follow doctors' orders. It meant I could simply enjoy cuddling and feeding Setri, poor, beautiful, deprived little Setri, who was finally getting what he needed.

The registrar returned from attending the emergency c-section. It was obvious to him straight away that we were feeding Setri, despite the nurses both feigning ignorance and saying “he's just having a little nuzzle”. What was also immediately obvious to the registrar was that Setri was absolutely fine, just as we'd said he would be.

To his credit, the registrar played the cards he was dealt, and just as well: having gained confidence from our defiance of doctors' orders and Setri's obvious satisfaction, Gam and I were in no mood to be messed around again. We knew that the registrar was simply going by the information that had been left for him, and he was just the latest in a long line of registrars who were unwilling to question the orders of the registrar who admitted Setri to Special Care in the first place, despite the subsequent lack of evidence for any of the differential diagnoses they could come up with, let alone the 'Respiratory Distress Syndrome' that the admitting doctor had recorded as the reason for his admission.

What I would need to do now, the doctor said, was come down to Special Care every 2 hours to feed Setri, who had now happily passed out in my arms. I would need to start with small feeds, he said, to allow Setri's digestive system to adjust after having been deprived of food. I didn't foresee a problem with any part of those instructions. Setri had only taken a small amount at this first feed, and seemed to know how much he needed. As for getting up every 2 hours, that was a piece of cake. My spirits soared at the thought of getting to see Setri throughout the night. Another registrar would see us in the morning, said the doctor, appearing relieved that someone else would have to deal with us as he bid us goodnight.

For the first time in what seemed like an age, things were looking up. Gam and I were determined that we'd take Setri home the next day. We didn't want to risk more bullshit, and we told my parents to expect to visit us at home in the afternoon.

On this matter, too, I can't believe that I didn't think to assert myself properly earlier. I had only ever given them permission to observe Setri. Placing him on a glucose drip and putting him nil-by-mouth was something they did that was not only against my better judgement, it was in violation of what I'd told them they were allowed to do. Depriving Setri of colostrum was actively harmful to his wellbeing. We spent far too long arguing that point with disinterested medical professionals who thought we were stupid. We bitterly disappointed ourselves by giving in to the registrars' insistence on a nasogastric tube. Throwing that back in their faces and feeding Setri against their instructions was the best thing we ever did, and we should have done it sooner. Why didn't we? We wanted to work with the doctors, not against them. We wanted them to see that what they were doing was not best practice, and agree to do the right thing. We gave them too much time, at Setri's expense, and they failed us all. If that nasogastric tube had succeeded they would have had the excuse they needed to keep him in hospital indefinitely. Gam and I really beat ourselves up over nearly allowing that to happen.

We went back to my room, only to find that I was being moved to the gynaecology ward, along with a bunch of other women who were either pregnant or whose babies had been taken away. They were running out of room in the maternity ward. Instead of a single room-mate I now had five. We would still have a midwife on duty overnight, I was told. Being accommodated in the gynaecology ward meant a much longer walk to Special Care, so Gam was a little angry on my behalf. I was still fairly fragile, physically, and he was worried it would be too much for me to walk the distance on my own every 2 hours. I told him not to worry. Walking was still difficult, but I was so elated that I was allowed to feed Setri that I felt I was floating. It wouldn't be a problem.

Gam and I went down to the food court level to buy Subway sandwiches for dinner. My parents had decided to stop for dinner there too, before heading home to my cousin's place. I hesitated for a second before ordering jalapenos and hot sauce on my roast beef sub, worried about the possibility that the spicy food would somehow put something in my breast milk that would upset Setri. I was paranoid about everything now, that anything could become an excuse to keep him in hospital. The main topic of conversation around the table was, of course Setri. My parents, having seen him, were as bemused as we were about the doctors' insistence on keeping him in Special Care. They weren't angry like we were, though. We hadn't told them the full story. I had had enough of stifling tears.

We bid goodnight to my parents and went to Special Care to feed Setri again. Sure enough, he had just woken for a feed. We sat together and cuddled him in our arms afterward as he fell asleep. Something suddenly occurred to me: Setri's hair seemed very clean, apart from a small hard clot of what looked like old blood stuck in his hair at the back. “Do you think they give them baths down here?”, I asked Gam. We hadn't been able to give Setri a bath before he was taken away for the first time. Since then, so much had happened that we hadn't thought of it since. “I don't know”, said Gam. They weren't allowed to cut the babies' nails, we had been told- something we would have liked them to do because Setri's nails were so long and sharp, and he was accidentally scratching his face. “Do the babies get baths here?”, Gam asked the nurse. They did, we were told. If they were very sick they were given a sponge down with a wet cloth, otherwise they got a bath every couple of days. “Another thing we've missed out on”, Gam muttered. We felt unaccountably sad about that one. It wasn't that we had been hung up on little milestones like that before Setri was born, but it was something that had been taken away from us without any acknowledgement, let alone permission. If Setri had actually been sick it would have been another matter, but he wasn't. The fact that we didn't get to give him his first bath just served as another symbol of what we'd missed out on as a result of the actions of the medical staff responsible for his admission and our incarceration. Suddenly that first bath seemed a lot more important. One more thing they'd taken away from us as a family. It would have been a small thing to ask if we wanted to be involved, to take photos, to help bathe him.

Gam stayed for as long as he could before heading off for the night, telling me to let him know every time I headed downstairs to feed Setri. I promised that I would keep my mobile with me at all times.

The midwife on duty was an older lady. She struck me as old-fashioned and motherly, in a nice way. She asked about Setri and told me she would wake me every 2 hours. I didn't need the help, but it was nice to have her as backup. I smsed Gam before I fell asleep to make sure he got home safely. I was justifiably worried that he was too sleep-deprived to drive. Relieved that he had, I set an alarm on my mobile phone for one-and-a-half hours' time, placed it under my pillow and fell asleep.

I was jolted awake for the first time by my phone's vibrations, and as I pulled on some clothes I saw the beam of a torch. The midwife had come to wake me. I thanked her, went to the bathroom, filled my drink bottle, messaged Gam and headed off to Special Care. I tucked my phone into my tubigrip because I had no bra and no pockets. Gam answered within seconds, well before I reached Special Care. He had obviously lain awake waiting to hear from me.

When I arrived at Special Care I was informed by the nurse that Setri had just started crying for a feed. I washed my hands and gowned up at lightning speed, the requisite 30 seconds of hand-washing seeming to take an age. The day and a half of deprivation had not dampened Setri's instinct for breastfeeding, but the constant scaremongering by the doctors had affected my confidence. Even though Setri fed happily, I was conscious of every little noise. He was still hooked up to the monitors, and the sticky pads would periodically detach and set off alarms. I watched the monitors like a hawk, afraid that for once they would show that Setri's oxygen saturation levels were dropping when he fed. They never did, but I felt I had to monitor everything that was going on all the time so that Gam and I would be able to hold our own in discussions with the doctors. Even the 'comfortable' chairs provided for breastfeeding- and Gam had ensured I was set up with the much sought-after recliner- got uncomfortable very quickly, but despite everything I still felt blissfully happy holding Setri and talking quietly to him. Seeing him happy was so satisfying.

Setri fed for around 20 minutes before dropping off to sleep, and while I felt I could have held him all night I knew I should sleep. I reluctantly laid him in his crib (he had been removed from the isolette in the interim) and waltzed out of the nursery with a huge smile on my face. I felt happier than I had at any point since Setri was born. Thanks to Gam standing up to the doctors we had started feeding Setri -and oh thank god, I thought, that the nasogastric tube had failed, or we would be staring down a tunnel of further unnecessary medical intervention with no end in sight. We dodged a bullet there, I knew. But Setri was fine, and now, maybe, finally, it would become obvious to the doctors that he was fine. Surely?

I made my way back through the empty hospital corridors to my bed, making sure to fill my drink bottle at the sink and have a big drink of water so I'd be well-hydrated for breastfeeding. I smsed Gam to let him know I was safely back at the ward. Again he replied within seconds, so I knew he had been waiting up to hear from me instead of going to sleep. I messaged him again and told him to get some sleep, then I set my alarm for an hour and a half's time.

This time it was the midwife on duty who woke me. Special Care had called, she said, Setri had awoken and wanted feeding. I had the panicky thought that I had somehow slept through my alarm, but I checked and discovered that Setri had merely woken 10 minutes early. I hurried through a visit to the bathroom- I would have waited but I needed to change my pad. Paranoid about bleeding on the floor again. I smsed Gam on the way down. He was obviously still waiting up. Another woman was there to feed her baby, too. I had seen her last time I came down, too. She gave me a long-suffering smile. From what I overheard of her conversation with the nurse, she had volunteered her baby to be taken to the nursery. Her baby girl wasn't a premie, she had just been waking every hour for a feed and not taking much at the breast. When the midwife had offered for her to be taken downstairs and looked after so she could get some sleep, she accepted. She had other children at home too. That would be weird, I thought. Being in hospital to have a baby, away from not only your husband but your children too.

This nurse was a good one. Whenever Setri's alarms went off, she switched off the machines so his feed would not be disturbed.

Setri once again breezed through his feed and fell asleep in my arms. He seemed to take a lot more at this feed, and I thought briefly of what the doctor had said about ensuring small feeds, before dismissing this. Setri knew exactly how much he needed. His last feed had been reasonably small and this one was bigger. It made sense. I left that place again with a huge smile on my face. It's hard to describe the unrelenting feeling of elation I had at being close to Setri again, at being allowed to feed him and give him what he needed. It felt so right. It would all have been so much better at home, with Gam, but after being deprived of contact with Setri for a considerable period it felt like a huge thing to be able to hold and feed him at all. Once again I laid Setri in his crib. He woke up this time, but the nurse on duty reassured me that he would fall asleep very quickly and that I should go upstairs and get some sleep. While walking the hospital corridors, Gam phoned me, concerned that I hadn't been in touch since letting him know I was heading to Special Care. He still hadn't slept. I had just got out of the nursery, I told him, and was on my way back to bed. Please, sleep. You need it.

I ran into the midwife as I re-entered my room. How had the feed gone?, she asked. She sounded like she genuinely cared. I didn't think she knew about our situation, but perhaps it had been a topic of conversation among the midwives. It was great, I told her, beaming. I liked her. When I told her that I didn't think Setri should be in Special Care she gave off a distinct aura of disagreement, without actually saying so, but I had the distinct impression she cared about how I was going.

Once again I made sure to set my alarm. The last feed having taken longer, I could only afford an hour and ten minutes' worth of sleep until the next feed. For a second I wished for longer, so I could get a decent sleep, then mentally scoffed at my silliness. I was going to see Setri- sleep didn't matter. Besides, I thought to myself, when I got home I'd still be waking every 2 hours.

An hour and ten minutes later I was awake again, and glad of it. I followed my new routine: dress, drink a bottle of water, pee, message Gam, then head down to Special Care. In Special Care, Setri was just stirring for a feed. There was no sign of my midnight-feeding compatriot this time, although her baby was still there. I overheard the nurse talking to another nurse. The baby had kept awakening and demanding feeds on the hour. The woman was exhausted at being phoned every hour to come and feed her baby. The last time it happened, the nurse had offered to give the infant a formula feed so the woman could at least get another hour of sleep. “I gave her 30mL of formula,” I heard the nurse tell the other nurse. Tough call. The nurse obviously felt like there was no other choice that would preserve the mother's health. It was so quiet in Special Care during the night that I was eavesdropping on the nurses partly by accident, but when they dropped their voices I would strain to hear them in case they said something about Setri. None of the nurses treated Setri like he was sick, and ever since I had overheard the nurse questioning the admitting registrar on why Setri's pulse oximetry monitor alarm had to be set so high I had tried to keep my ears open to further snippets of dissent. To no avail, really. I didn't hear them talking about Setri at all. Either they were too clever to talk in front of us, or they had actual sick babies to worry about.

Back to bed.

I was once again in Special Care cradling Setri when the sun came up. Things always seemed to get busier after sunrise. I really preferred the place at night. It was almost pleasant to be there on my own, with Setri.