Thursday, August 30, 2007

Andrew Johns comes clean


The rugby league players who, er, aren't on drugs...

That ridiculous 'someone put drugs in my pocket and I forgot to take them out' story didn't hold any water and I guess he knew it. Good on him. If only the NRL and AFL could drop the pretence that the leagues consist of good clean role models for kids, and the media could stop upholding the pretence, maybe there'd be some progress in cleaning up the sports.

Hands off the Virgin, Howard


Mikey has already posted on our perenially dog-whistling PM's response to a rather harmless statue of the 'Virgin' Mary with a burqa on her head.

"The choice of such artwork is gratuitously offensive to the religious beliefs of many Australians", said John Howard.

Now, I grew up going to church every Sunday, and had my fair share of exposure to depictions of Jesus' mother. In most, if not all, of these depictions of Mary, her head was covered (although not her face) with a headscarf that looked not dissimilar to the ones I see loads of muslim girls wearing every day. I can't see how any of this is 'offensive'- it appears to be more of a massive attempt by the PM to stir up some religious and racial hatred and score brownie points with churchgoing types. Trying to scrape up as many votes as possible in the face of polls that look pretty horrendous for the Howard government.

The most sensible response seems to be from the Anglican bishop of South Sydney, Robert Forsyth:

He said the artwork comparing Jesus to bin Laden was "somewhat critical" rather than offensive.

"It raises questions about what they have got in common and how they are different - Jesus himself said there will be many false Christs that will arise," he said.

Christians ought to be cautious about "running to the press" to complain about being offended, he said.

"You need to limit the language of outrage to things that are really outrageous," he said.

"[Politicians] should get on with running the country. Even though they are Christian men it's not an area they should be commenting on."


And yes, that goes for Rudd as well, who has done yet another 'me too' on the issue (the Beazley impersonation is wearing really thin, Kev).

Saggy baggy, don't arrest me


It seems parts of America are undergoing a Talibanisation of sorts, with fines and possible jail terms for people who wear 'offensive' clothes such as too-low pants.


Starting in Louisiana, an intensifying push by lawmakers has determined pants worn low enough to expose underwear poses a threat to the public, and they have enacted indecency ordinances to stop it.

Since June 11, sagging pants have been against the law in Delcambre, La., a town of 2,231 that is 80 miles southwest of Baton Rouge. The style carries a fine of as much as $500 or up to a six-month sentence. “We used to wear long hair, but I don’t think our trends were ever as bad as sagging,” said Mayor Carol Broussard.

An ordinance in Mansfield, a town of 5,496 near Shreveport, subjects offenders to a fine (as much as $150 plus court costs) or jail time (up to 15 days). Police Chief Don English said the law, which takes effect Sept. 15, will set a good civic image.

Behind the indecency laws may be the real issue — the hip-hop style itself, which critics say is worn as a badge of delinquency, with its distinctive walk conveying thuggish swagger and a disrespect for authority. Also at work is the larger issue of freedom of expression and the questions raised when fashion moves from being merely objectionable to illegal.



I don't think it needs to be said that banning specific items of clothing from being worn in public is just a thoroughly bad idea. It sets a precedent for impinging on all sorts of freedoms. How is it different in principle from Saudi Arabia, where religious police might arrest and/or beat a person for wearing the wrong thing? If you ask me all the punishment the fashion victims who wear their pants that way need will be in a few years time when their kids see photos like the one above and laugh at them for looking so stupid.

Wednesday, August 29, 2007

They're Coming To Take Our Jobs!!!


Except the government is helping business use immigration to undercut Australian wages and oppress... Hey! Look over there, it's a boatload of refugees!!!


THE Philippine Government has called on Australia to modify its 457 skilled visa scheme after the Herald exposed the illegal treatment of immigrants, including two Filipinos who died in workplace accidents.

But the Immigration Minister, Kevin Andrews, defended the visas yesterday and insisted the workers could freely complain about their employment conditions - a claim directly contradicted by a metal fabricator who came forward to say his boss threatened to break his legs and send him "back to India" when he asked for overtime pay.

Mohammed Nayeem, 45, from Singapore, told the Herald he had been forced to work 50-hour weeks but only paid for 38, and had $100 a week deducted to share a two-bedroom converted office space with five other workers while working at a construction firm in western Sydney.

SMH


Meanwhile the idiots whose jobs are being threatened by this legalised slavery are busy foaming at the idea of not torturing refugees for years at public expense. Instead of demanding that every immigrant get the same wages, conditions and protections as Australians, a situation that would pretty much end the importation of forced labour and it's effects on wages, people would rather pay for Woomera and Nauru. It's incredible that racism can trump even self interest. The 457 scheme is a massive scam. There is no policing of the visas, no monitoring of their conditions and no inspections of the workplaces the people work at. With Rudd's capitulation stopping unions visiting work places, people like these are pretty much fucked.

'Diary entry' - Pride, culture and communication


Another thought-provoking Torres Strait Islander Studies class today. First there was another lecture on 'discourse analysis', which is a fancy-sounding way of saying we look at the way language couches mainstream Australia's understanding of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Or lack of understanding. Sort of implicit in the lecture was the question of why, in order to gain rights to their own land, indigenous Australians had to make a case that included meeting a standard of proof in keeping with Western or British standards rather than their own in asserting their right to ownership of their land. That's something I've always wondered about- the fairness of forcing people to go up against the same system that ensured their land was taken from them, and meet a standard of proof set by the people they are trying to win back the land from. The Mabo case might have succeeded (after the poor guy's death, as it were), but John Howard's land grab in the Northern Territory shows that the decision of the courts to grant native title effectively means nothing in the long run.

In the second half of the class we had another guest lecturer, Matilda (dunno about the spelling)- I suppose I should call her Auntie Matilda- a Mabuiag Island lady from the Brisbane Torres Strait Islander community. She was cool- very jolly, one of those people that just seem to radiate warmth. What she talked about most was cultural pride, and the efforts the TSI people go to in order to keep their culture even when living on the mainland.

In her case, the effort seems to be born of necessity. Perhaps its part homesickness, but after 20 years in Brisbane she spoke of going 'home' regularly to 'recharge her batteries' and of 'feeling alive' when she is able to speak her own language. But she and many other parents in the Torres Strait Islander community apparently also send their 'city kids' back for things like initiation ceremonies, to learn from various uncles and elders and to know where they came from. I thought that was really nice, and important too.

A beach with sheep, near Cape Coast, Ghana.

When she spoke of how the kinship system differs from Western system it was a little familiar to me thanks to my time spent in Ghana with Gam and his family a couple of years ago. Obviously it's not exactly the same, but the closer relationships between extended families is one similarity, and the lack of words to describe the 'distance' in such relationships is a key feature- no such thing as a 'second cousin once removed', for example. No such thing as a 'second cousin' either. I always found such things pretty confusing anyway!

The way they may refer to someone of their own approximate age as 'sister' or 'brother' (Auntie Matilda was introduced as our lecturer Georgina's sister, as was last week's guest speaker), and their biological sister or brother's children as their own children (who in turn may call them 'mum' or 'dad' rather than 'auntie' or 'uncle') reminded me of how the two girls (siblings), Yaakitiwa and Abena who looked after the house we stayed in in Ghana called me 'sister-Sarah' and Gam's sister 'sister-Delali'. They also called each other 'sister-Abena' and 'sister-Yaa', respectively. I didn't find adopting that manner of speaking as easy as calling everyone 'Auntie' or 'Uncle', although I was pretty touched that they referred to me like that- I think I just called them by their first names, and it's only today that it occurred to me that it might have been rude of me to do so. I hope not.

One of the things about TSI (or perhaps just Mabuiag Island) culture I found a bit alien was her explanation of why in-laws in that society traditionally have very distant relationships: it's apparently the job of the in-laws to organise a person's funeral while their immediate family is given the opportunity to mourn. The distance (including not being allowed to call one's sister-in-law by name, for example) is to keep that person level-headed enough at the time when they're needed to organise the funeral. It's very practical, but very alien to me. I don't know if it manifests itself as a minimisation of contact between a person and their in-laws or just extends as far as not calling an in-law by their name, but it's apparently bad luck if you slip up and do call them by their name!

I guess I say alien because I have a good relationship with my 'in-laws'. Perhaps if I didn't get on well with them I'd think a system that gave me an excuse to distance myself from them was a great idea! Mummy and Daddy treat me like a daughter, and there are a lot of things that they'll be able to teach our future kids that I won't be able to, and even Gam wouldn't be able to (their respective mother-tongues, Fante and Ewe being two of those things). Maybe the TSI or Maubiag system only applies to brothers and sisters-in-law, not parents-in-law I'm not sure.

----------------------------------------

Auntie Matilda said that when she first came to the mainland and to Brisbane (she was sent to boarding school in Rockhampton for some time) she thought people were 'so rude' because of the different way they would introduce themselves. She said in the TSI it's customary when you meet someone for them to introduce themselves by their full name, as once you know their family name you can establish basically where you stand in the social network (maybe you know someone from their family, or perhaps there might be a relative in common).

Here, where it's customary to introduce oneself by one's first name only, she said it seemed at the time like no-one wanted to know her. It's funny, but such things become so ingrained that you don't even realise that not everyone does it the same way you do. I know in Botswana I noted very early the way they have of shaking hands differs, where you take a person's hand with both your hands, but every time I met someone I would automatically shake hands the western way. And mentally kick myself afterwards for forgetting to shake properly! I guess when both sides have an understanding that things are done differently in different places or cultures it's ok, but going somewhere and having no idea that a particular custom in that area is something that you're conditioned to find offensive or rude must be quite a shock at first.

Republican Closet Slightly Less Full


"Wanna come home with me and check out my 'wide stance'?"

Republican US Senator Larry Craig of Idaho said on Tuesday he was not gay and had made a mistake in pleading guilty to disorderly conduct following a June arrest at a Minnesota airport men's toilet.

First elected to the US Senate in 1990, Craig was arrested by a plainclothes police officer investigating complaints of lewd conduct in the men's public restroom at the Minneapolis-St Paul International Airport.

Craig had entered a toilet stall and tapped his foot in "a signal used by persons wishing to engage in lewd conduct", the investigator in the police incident report was quoted as saying in Roll Call, the US Capitol Hill newspaper.

"I am not gay, I never have been gay,'' he told reporters in Boise, Idaho, and apologised to the people of Idaho for what he said was a "cloud'' placed over Idaho because of the incident.

"I did nothing wrong," he said.

"At the time of this incident, I complained to the police that they were misconstruing my actions. I was not involved in any inappropriate conduct," Craig said.

SMH

Hmmm...

According to the incident report, Sgt. Dave Karsnia was working as a plainclothes officer on June 11 investigating civilian complaints regarding sexual activity in the men’s public restroom in which Craig was arrested.

Airport police previously had made numerous arrests in the men’s restroom of the Northstar Crossing in the Lindbergh Terminal in connection with sexual activity.

Karsnia entered the bathroom at noon that day and about 13 minutes after taking a seat in a stall, he stated he could see “an older white male with grey hair standing outside my stall.”

The man, who lingered in front of the stall for two minutes, was later identified as Craig.

“I could see Craig look through the crack in the door from his position. Craig would look down at his hands, ‘fidget’ with his fingers, and then look through the crack into my stall again. Craig would repeat this cycle for about two minutes,” the report states.

Craig then entered the stall next to Karsnia’s and placed his roller bag against the front of the stall door.

“My experience has shown that individuals engaging in lewd conduct use their bags to block the view from the front of their stall,” Karsnia stated in his report. “From my seated position, I could observe the shoes and ankles of Craig seated to the left of me.”

Craig was wearing dress pants with black dress shoes.

“At 1216 hours, Craig tapped his right foot. I recognized this as a signal used by persons wishing to engage in lewd conduct. Craig tapped his toes several times and moves his foot closer to my foot. I moved my foot up and down slowly. While this was occurring, the male in the stall to my right was still present. I could hear several unknown persons in the restroom that appeared to use the restroom for its intended use. The presence of others did not seem to deter Craig as he moved his right foot so that it touched the side of my left foot which was within my stall area,” the report states.

Craig then proceeded to swipe his hand under the stall divider several times, and Karsnia noted in his report that “I could ... see Craig had a gold ring on his ring finger as his hand was on my side of the stall divider.”

Karsnia then held his police identification down by the floor so that Craig could see it.

“With my left hand near the floor, I pointed towards the exit. Craig responded, ‘No!’ I again pointed towards the exit. Craig exited the stall with his roller bags without flushing the toilet. ... Craig said he would not go. I told Craig that he was under arrest, he had to go, and that I didn’t want to make a scene. Craig then left the restroom.”

In a recorded interview after his arrest, Craig “either disagreed with me or ‘didn’t recall’ the events as they happened,” the report states.

Craig stated “that he has a wide stance when going to the bathroom and that his foot may have touched mine,” the report states. Craig also told the arresting officer that he reached down with his right hand to pick up a piece of paper that was on the floor.

“It should be noted that there was not a piece of paper on the bathroom floor, nor did Craig pick up a piece of paper,” the arresting officer said in the report.

Roll Call



Why would a police officer be wasting their time picking up men in toilets? Silly! because of legislators like Larry Craig!

PoochieChoices



When do we get to the fireworks factory Kevin?

Labor would also retain Work Choices' restrictions on union officials' rights to enter workplaces and sanctions against illegal strikes such as secondary boycotts and pattern bargaining where unions pursue industry-wide agreements.


Of course Poochie-Rudd's watering down of workchoices still isn't enough for the usual suspects:

The Australian Mines and Metals Association was scathing. Its chief executive, Steve Knott, said the plan was "an anti-business transition to the past" which would jeopardise productivity and industrial harmony in the resources sector.

Mr Knott said two-thirds of employees in the resources industry earned less than $100,000 and Labor's policy would deny them access to individual agreements which overrode awards.
SMH

I love the preposterous implication that the only thing stopping him paying everyone $100,000 dollars is a policy that doesn't actually exist as legislation yet. This is what Rudd's up against. The mining industry has won the lottery, they can't stop making money while the Chinese are buying big piles of Aussie dirt. I'm talking printing money here. Of course because we live in Australia, they have to pay workers a fair wage for living in the middle of nowhere and doing dangerous work.

At the same time they can see mining industries in places like South Africa, the US and China where workers are paid next to nothing (and die all the time) and they have dollar signs in their eyes. If they can slash wages profits will go from disgusting to obscene and Steve Knott can pay himself a massive bonus, retire and be carried around on a litter for the rest of his life. It's that simple. Anyone who thinks that he wants to pay his workers more is a fucking moron.

Mining is so profitable that Tasmanian tailings dumps are worth taking a look at now, it has nothing to do with productivity. They can't get the stuff out of the country fast enough, if there's a productivity bottleneck it's the nation's creaking infrastructure. People like Knott know this. This is why Rudd can't appease business on this issue. Big business wants to fuck workers over, small business is too stupid to think about compliance costs, taxation and the effects of wage cuts in a service economy. Neither of them will accept anything less than effective slavery. Both groups don't even think Howard has gone far enough.

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

Campbell Newman vs Public Transport


More room for mah Lexus, bitches!

From a Brisbane Times article on the impact that the Hale Street Link bridge construction will have on the traffic on Coronation Drive:

Preparations for the [construction of a $210 million toll bridge] began in March when Cr Quirk and Lord Mayor Campbell Newman turned off the T3 transit lanes on Coronation Drive for the duration of construction.

The controversial decision was made to relieve congestion on the busy riverside stretch, which carries about 92,000 vehicles per day.

A research report presented to the Roads, TransApex and Traffic committee today found the change had improved traffic flow at the Toowong end of Coronation Drive but had actually doubled average bus travel times during the peak morning period.



I guess those arseholes never take the bus to work, huh?

Oh Dear...


Alexander Downer's special seat in the Liberal party room


KEVIN Rudd has surged in popularity despite repeated reports about his strip club visit and a record surplus by the Howard Government.

The Labor Party now leads the Government by an extraordinary 14 points on a two-party preferred vote in the latest Herald Sun/Galaxy poll - a result that would see a landslide ALP win if repeated at the coming election.

Instead of damaging Mr Rudd's standing, revelations of a visit to the strip club appear to have helped him, with 85 per cent of voters polled saying it showed he was "a normal bloke".

A third said he was unlucky to be caught out. Just 10 per cent said it showed poor morals - and opinion was almost universal with male and female voters taking a similar view.

However in more bad news for the Howard Government, its economic credentials have taken a battering after Treasurer Peter Costello unveiled a $17 billion surplus last week.

Rather than attributing the surplus to good economic management, 51 per cent of those polled believe the Government accumulated its surplus by setting taxes too high.

Even 29 per cent of Coalition voters said the surplus had been achieved by excessive taxing.

Just 32 per cent of voters overall gave the Government credit for building the surplus through good economic management.

The Australian


Last week I thought:

Just heard an interview with "journalist" Glenn Milne where he refused to deny that Downer put him onto this four year old story that apparently been common knowledge among the press corps. The rest of the govt. is staying quiet about this because, unlike Downer, the slow kid who always eats his crayons, they have learned that smear attacks on Rudd don't work because he hasn't been around as long as they have. The story that Rudd being the last Queenslander to go to a strip club is laughable reason to not vote for him, especially compared to the moral lodestars in the current govt.


Oh to be a fly on the wall at the next party room meeting...

Are You Liberals In Disguise?


THE Democrats will paint the Greens as a party that has done nothing but oppose the Howard Government and is therefore not capable of holding the balance of power in the Senate.

Democrats leader Lyn Allison told The Australian the Greens would be targeted in the election campaign as having done little in parliament and of trying to block everything the Government did.

Most pundits believe the Australian Democrats are facing political extinction.

"There's only one occasion where (the Greens have) supported the Government," Senator Allison said, "whereas we've engaged with the Government and engaged in the process of making the legislation on so many occasions.

"We are going to be running on how responsibly we've acted with balance of power and the record demonstrates that. We won't attack the Greens, but we do need to draw a comparison between them and us because to suggest that the Greens would work with the Government on balance of power is frankly nonsensical."

Senator Allison, who has been worried about her party's chances at the federal poll, expected in October or November, said she would urge the major parties to allocate preferences to the Democrats ahead of the Greens.

"(Senator Bob) Brown has only used his vote to assist the Government on one occasion; it was the plebiscite for the republican convention," she said.

"The Greens are saying we are finished and they are ready to step into the field, and we need to challenge that."

She said the Greens had not been active enough in Senate committee work.

Senator Brown rejected Senator Allison's claims.

"It is true that the Democrats have supported the Howard Government on issues like the GST that we've opposed and it's also true that they are repositioning themselves," he said. "There is a long list of bills where we haven't opposed the Government."

The Australian


Pathetic. Their job isn't to support the govt. or work with them. It's to advance their vision for Australia. If that means supporting the govt. sometimes, so be it. The idea that they should 'assist' the government is pretty shameful. She's going to prostitute her party to the major parties, obviously implying that they'll be much more pliant than the greens so why not preference them? Have things gotten that bad? No one trusts you with their vote because your party does things like this, so the solution is to keep doing things like this but bash the greens; instead of attacking the major parties, which you can't do because you want their preferences. If they'll sell their principles for preferences why the hell should I preference them? If they become dependent on major party prefs for survival how are they going to be anything other than a sock puppet? That doesn't sound like keeping the bastards honest to me. No preferences for the Democrats here I'm afraid.

Lyn Allison makes up my mind


After reading that the Democrats have once again decided that Enemy No. 1 at the upcoming federal election is not the Howard government, not the Labor Party and not the religious nutbags Family First, I won't be directing my preferences to the Democrats as has been my usual practice.

Australia needs more Greens in the Senate. I think it also needs more Democrats in the Senate, but not at the expense of the Greens- rather it needs to be expense of the Liberals, Nationals or Family First if this country isn't to remain in the moral quagmire it has occupied for the past decade.

Monday, August 27, 2007

Citizens wanted. Must have sense of humour.

From the sample questions for Australian citizenship exams in the federal government's draft Becoming An Australian Citizen workbook:

Q10. Who do Members of Parliament represent?


A10. The people of their electorate

Oh those kidders... next they'll be telling us the Queen of England has some sort of right to be Australia's head of state. But seriously, they've got no right to mess with the gullible minds of potential new citizens like that.

Glenn Milne, Douchebag


A rare photo of Glenn Milne at work

There is no doubt Rudd’s current plan makes for extremely smart “headline” politics, striking as it does at the inherent health policy timidity of the Howard Government. Ironically that policy caution was only underlined by Howard’s own foray into the same area - his piecemeal attempt to take over the Mersey Hospital in Tasmania for no good reason other than it was in a marginal seat. But closer examination suggests Rudd’s initiative has opened up vulnerabilities for Labor on two fronts.


Rudd surges ahead in latest poll

The Labor Party now leads the Government by an extraordinary 14 points on a two-party preferred vote in the latest Herald Sun/Galaxy poll - a result that would see a landslide ALP win if repeated at the coming election.

Some vulnerability, Glenn.

The approach is this; craft superficially attractive commitments with immediate voter appeal. But then push them so far out into the future that they are rendered almost meaningless in budget terms. And hope in the meantime the electorate doesn’t read the fine print.

...

The essence of what Rudd announced runs thus; a national health and hospital reform plan would be drawn up in the first 100 days of a Labor government. At the same time the states would be paid a $2 billion incentive to bring their hospital services up to an agreed standard. If the states do not agree to the reform plan the commonwealth takeover would begin in 2009 with the full takeover to be put to a referendum at the 2010 election. To make the plan work, the GST component of health spending on hospitals - estimated at $20 billion covering 750 hospitals - would have to be clawed back from the states. It’s important that this be understood. Rudd is proposing not only to take defining powers away from the states he wants $20 billion back from them as well.


Er, if the GST component of health spending won't actually be being spent by the states, hospitals having been taken over, why would this be a claw back? This looks like a false dilemma Glenn.

Since the hospitals plan was unveiled we’ve been assured by a succession of Labor figures that it will never come to this. This relies on the blithe notion that Rudd will be able to successfully negotiate with the states because they too are all run by Labor.

...

Or maybe he can negotiate with them because he's not out to score cheap political points off them like the dessicated coconut and his tawdry election plan?

The question then arises, if Rudd can’t wrest the $20 billion back from the states in order to fund his hospitals takeover, where does he get the additional money to make his plan work? Labor has been relishing the prospect of rubbing Tony Abbott’s nose in the fact that Abbott proposed doing much the same with hospitals in 2005 only to be rebuffed by the Prime Minister. What is not generally known, and what Kevin Rudd certainly doesn’t know, is why.

The impression has been that Howard dismissed Abbott out of hand. In fact serious work was done on the proposal. It’s now emerged cabinet finally decided it wouldn’t work because it would be politically impossible to rewrite the GST revenue deal with the states

Oh, that's it then, politically impossible. Typical Howard. Can I make a political gain? No? Well fuck them. Political expediency trumps the everything. Australia can get stuffed. Thanks for that Glenn, you just proved a point I made a few days ago.

So Rudd’s proud boast in unveiling his hospital plan - that “the buck stops with me” - may come back to haunt him in ways he hadn’t anticipated. Rudd, of course, will argue that this scare campaign is irrelevant because his reforms don’t really begin to bite until 2010 - after the next election. And that’s if he wins it.

The Australian - do read the comments, they're hilarious.

Yes, stupid Kevin. Dumb ten year plans, doesn't he know it's all about political expediency and quick fixes that unravel every three years and scare the voters so you can throw more money at more quick fixes? You certainly never take responsibility for anything! What you do is lie and count on intestinal parasites like Glenn Milne to get to work deflecting the responsibility you should have taken. That's how things are done!

Surprise surprise Milne and the govt. are singing off the same song sheet with Captain Smirk starting the GST (you know the one we were never ever going to get) scare campaign. This is the govt. that has spent $200,000,000 on marginal electorates already. No plan, no vision just a pathetic, shabby, exhausted govt. trying to buy its way to Howard's legacy. That's it ladies and gentlemen. This is Milne's only argument against a healthcare revolution. That it's politically inconvenient and Rudd won't score any political points off it. Lay off the grog Glenn, it's starting to show in your writing.

The Labor View from Broome


Priority #1: booting out the riff-raff.


A couple of days ago a blogger by the name of Kevin Rennie emailed me a link to his blog 'Labor View from Broome'. Apart from the fact he lives in a lovely place I'd very much like to visit, I thought his blog worth linking to because I'm not familiar with any bloggers from WA apart from Hourann in Perth and it would be nice to get some perspectives from outside the capital cities that don't consist of frothy-mouthed rantings by Pauline Hanson-loving ratbags.

The 'about me' section on Kevin's blog says

Secondary teacher, unionist and Australian Labor Party member for 35 years. 8 years teaching in the Northern Territory: 4 in Katherine, followed by 4 in Maningrida, an aboriginal community in Arnhem Land. Broome resident since January 2007.


Which makes me think he'd probably have some useful insights on John Howard's invasion of Northern Territory aboriginal communities.

My only suggestion to improve the blog is to have lots of photos so I can live there vicariously through reading. Mmmm, Broome. It was good enough for our PM to take a taxpayer-funded holiday there, it's good enough for me (if somewhat tainted now).

Kevin Andrews, Catbert With Ministerial Portfolio


KEVIN ANDREWS has fudged his CV. Both his parliamentary and ministerial websites claim he was "co-author" of three books in the days before he entered Parliament. All appear to have been pumped out by the then Melbourne barrister in a remarkable creative outburst in 1990.

But the publishers do not see his role that way. They credit other authors and editors with assembling these collections. The name Kevin Andrews is not on the title pages. He appears to have done no more then contribute one paper to each. He does not even have top billing.

Over the past week, the Immigration Minister has been scathing about irregularities in the CV of Dr Mohamed Haneef's former Gold Coast colleague Dr Mohammed Asif Ali. The doctor is reported to have left the country and lost his job for exaggerating his employment in India by three months.

"This only came to light because of an Australian Federal Police investigation," Mr Andrews told the ABC.

"I think that Premier Beattie should be assuring the people of Queensland that this is an isolated case - that there is no other case in which somebody has falsified their information."

The three books Mr Andrews claims to have co-authored are:

* Rights and Freedoms in Australia, published by The Federation Press. The title page names the Melbourne lawyers Jude Wallace and Tony Pagone, QC, as editors of this collection of 25 papers. Mr Andrews's lone contribution is titled "You as an Elderly Person".

* Trends in Biomedical Regulation, published by Butterworths. The title page says this collection was edited by Hiram Caton, then of Griffith University. Mr Andrews contributed one of 21 papers: "Regulating Embryo Experimentation".

* Issues in Biomedical Ethics, published by Macmillan in India. This record of proceedings of an international congress of the Festival of Life was edited by Dr C. J. Vas and E. J. De Souza, leaders of a Catholic ethics centre in Mumbai. Mr Andrews's contribution, one of 39, was "In-vitro Fertilisation and Genetic Manipulation - Australian Developments."

Publishers consulted by the Herald said they would regard Mr Andrews as merely a contributor to these collections. The definition of authorship in the Vancouver Protocol cited by academic bodies like the National Health and Medical Research Council requires at a minimum: "substantial participation [in] conception and design … drafting … and final approval of the version to be published".

That is not the minister's view of the situation. He stands by his claims of co-authorship.

"The minister did not ever claim to be a lead author," explained his spokeswoman, Kate Walsh. "He is the co-author of publications that have no lead author, that have a series of chapters written by different people."

SMH

That's funny, his website doesn't mention any of those other people, leaving the impression that he wrote those books himself.


Publications

Rights and Freedoms in Australia (co-author), Sydney: Federation Press, 1990.

Trends in Biomedical Regulation (co-author), Sydney: Butterworths, 1990.

Issues in Biomedical Ethics (co-author), Delhi: Macmillan, 1990.


Andrews' Ministerial Website


I guess Andrews' free education (courtesy of the Whitlam govt.) was wasted on him. A co-author is a joint author of a particular work, not a contributor to a collection of articles. Claiming otherwise is plagiary, which he doesn't have to worry about, being a scummy liar already. More importantly, is he really suggesting: Thank god we arbitrarily imprisoned a man for weeks, ruined his life and job; slandered and libeled him before unjustly deporting him because it brought to light the fact that someone who worked in the same hospital as him added THREE MONTHS to a job they had? You lose your job for that? Is that a key skill criterion these days? By that metric Andrews' should be rubbed with ash, dressed in sackcloth and forced to spend the rest of his days as a wandering tinker for faking his CV.

Sunday, August 26, 2007

How To Defeat the Howard Porn Filter


Attention, if you're reading this, chances are things have turned out for the worst and Howard's gotten back in. Worse yet, you're forced to download a porn filter and your supplies of fap fodder and ability to read wikipedia articles and other stuff is threatened. Well you can get past it. Please be aware that I'm not telling you what you should or should not do with your internet access or responsible if you bork your computer. I'm just doing my bit to make sure you can grow up free, like your parents did. Filters tend to be dumb and block things like wikipedia pages, sex education websites etc. That is (currently) not illegal Ok:



1) Avoid it all together. Download a Linux distribution and use that, I recommend openSUSE. If it's too big or your connection is too slow, get a USB stick and use this or this instead. If you were using Linux already, you wouldn't have to worry about this, although it's likely your parents would have been smart enough to lock down your computer more effectively, had they chosen this route.

2) Disable it using MSCONFIG. Make sure you turn it back on a gain or the man will figure you out.



3) Try an anonymous proxy browser, this may or may not work. It'll probably be our only recourse if Stephen Fielding (Senator for the Can't control my sexual urges and need the govt. to do it for me party) makes ISPs filter the internet. That is if you can still afford it after they get done.



4) Try installing cygwin, KDE and use konqueror for browsing, this may or may not work.

5) Get on your p2p program and download VMware install windows in a virtual machine and try that.

6) Tell your parents to stop being tools and talk about stuff like porn with you if they're so worried about it.

Enjoy your freedom.

Saturday, August 25, 2007

So Much To Do At APEC Land


But you can't come!


Fireworks - but not for you


August 25, 2007 - 1:07PM

Fireworks over Sydney Harbour will mark the closure of APEC but the public have been told not to attend.

Tall ships also will grace the harbour for the display named "River of Fire" but organisers moved today to ensure that it was staged for VIP eyes only, citing the security crackdown.

"This short five-minute firework display, accompanied by some tall ships and yachts on the harbour, will feature a colourful display fired from barges only, not from the Sydney Harbour Bridge," APEC spokeswoman Anne Fulwood said.

"It will complement the APEC logo that will shine from the Sydney Harbour Bridge from September 2 to 9.

"The fireworks are a very short part of the evening and I would not suggest that it's worthwhile for the public to try to view the display."

...

Ms Fulwood said the concert and fireworks were designed to "show our guests from the Asia-Pacific a celebration of a confident nation rejoicing and proud of a wealth of talented performers".

But she said the best place for others to see the fireworks was on television "to minimise possible disruption".

The opera house is in the centre of a locked-down security zone during APEC.


SMH


Maybe you can see them from the "free speech zones" that are the hallmark of a "confident nation rejoicing"?

Vae Victis


Energy efficiency may be on the agenda at APEC but it not in practised when Mr Bush hits the road. His motorcade, if anyone gets close enough to see it, will comprise more than a dozen cars, including the armour-plated presidential limousine, a Cadillac DTS fitted with the latest in secure communications devices. An identical decoy car is always included.

A normal Cadillac DTS sedan consumes 13 litres of petrol per 100 kilometres in the city, and 8.7 litres on the highway. But that is before it is stretched, and fitted with bullet-proof glass and armour plating.

The Chevy Suburbans are even less thrifty, consuming nearly 16 litres per 100 kilometres in the city, and that again is before they are modified. The last Suburban in the line often has its tailgate up and is bristling with machineguns. In front and along the sides it is flanked with motorcycles.

Protesters will be kept in what are known in the US as free-speech zones - well away from the man himself. Chances are, Mr Bush will be oblivious to any protests, as they are usually kept 500 metres to a kilometre from the venues. Anyone entering the secure zone, even with a permit, will be searched for placards or other material critical of the President.


SMH

Friday, August 24, 2007

Go Mary!


Dear SBS,

It's time for us to come clean on just how much we think your new 6.30pm news format stinks. We've been watching SBS news since the broadcast range was extended to non-metropolitan areas of NSW (late 90s?), and none of the changes made to the news program since that time have been to its obvious detriment up until the recent addition of advertisements and the change to a soft 1 hour news format. When we first heard that the news would run for an hour we were pleased, thinking it would be merely more of the quality we had come to expect from SBS news over the years. Wrong!

More to the point, it turns out it's not just the two of us with this opinion. You guys aren't reporting on the furore that's erupted over Mary Kostakidis, but it's a sure bet you're watching more carefully than anyone what others are reporting. If that's the case you may well have noticed that she has almost universal support and good will from the public and her media colleagues.

We'll leave you with a taste of what some of your regular viewers think of this matter:

6 Comments:

  • stan grant is a useless news reader and an even worse interviewer. he comes across as a pompous, untalented tool, which is presumably what got him on cnn. wish he'd go back there and we could get mary back. sbs really seems to be going down the commercial gurgler these days. first negus now this.

    By Gam, at 21/8/07 4:24 PM

  • Oh, I can't stand George Negus! What a fuckstick.

    I'll be disappointed if she leaves too. And Lee Lin Chin's hair always deserves it's own special mention.

    By Magic Bellybutton, at 21/8/07 7:14 PM

  • Fuck oath, man. The new hour long format sucks donkey's balls.

    It's all fucking filler - "your say": since when did a goddamn web-survey and the comments of the few deranged tools worked up enough to comment qualify as "news".

    Jesus H. Christ, I watched SBS to get away from all that non-news bullshit that pollutes the majors - and to get some real international news.

    Sadly, both seem to be disappearing. The interviews are even worse - dodgy, arguably bias or unqualified people rambling to stupid prepared questions by Stan Grant, desperately trying to give his best Witness impression.

    Pah. I hate it.

    By patrick, at 21/8/07 9:23 PM

  • Patrick- I totally agree! I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks so. Whenever Stan Grant is doing one of his stupid interviews I'll even flick channels to see what's on Today Tonight or A Current Affair in preference to watching him! And more often than not I'll switch to the ABC at 7pm when SBS has yet another ad break. And the 'your say' bit shits me too. I feel sorry for the original SBS newsreaders because they are all highly qualified, multi-talented individuals, not bimbos whose sole qualification is a nice coiff and the ability to read off an autocue.

    By Sarah, at 21/8/07 11:17 PM

  • Say it isn't so.

    I *love* Mary Kostakidis. She's professional and smart, but you can tell that she could rip you a new arse hole if you pissed her off enough, and that's why I like her. Poor dear should do what she feels is best, but I agree that it just won't be SBS News Australia without her.

    Oh, lamentations!

    By Anonymous, at 21/8/07 11:24 PM

  • Lamentations here too! Mary K rocks, and Lee Lin Chin - the hair, the marvelous, spikey, grey wonderful hair! She is so utterly stylish and whatsisname is a total wanker. Gah.

    By Rebekka, at 22/8/07 11:38 AM

(from http://todaysapatheticyouth.blogspot.com/2007/08/no-mary.html)

It also wouldn't be a bad idea if you guys checked out the Mary Kostakidis support groups on facebook; already hundreds of people have joined up. We're saying this as big fans of SBS and most of its programming, and no doubt everyone else is too. By screwing over Mary Kostakidis you're screwing over your viewers. You won't find the same sort of support for Stan Grant and you know it.

Yours in hope that this will be sorted out ASAP,

Sarah and Gam



In other Mary Kostakidis news, The Age is reporting that Mary is unlikely to reconcile with SBS and rejoin the news team. Which means SBS are still screwing her around. Those idiots will have really shot themselves in the foot if they lose her. Who do they think they are? A substandard version of Channel 10?

Attila and Hermutrude



After our (my) disaster with Angelina earlier this year, followed shortly after by Armando's death after a long illness, we had a fish-free period for a while. Given that I once again have Wednesday classes and there happens to be a guy at the markets every Wednesday who sells mighty fine siamese fighters at a decent price ($8.50 for a regular male, $13.50 for a crowntail and $6 for a female- all about $5 cheaper than petshop prices), it was only a matter of time before I gave in. I took Rach along for a look when she was here, and picked up two fish, a male and a female.







There were some absolutely stunning males in colours I haven't seen before, but I picked Attila because he seemed to have the most personality and be keenest to flaunt himself, despite being relatively plain.




There were only two females to choose from- a young, small and inquisitive white female with red fins, or plump, homely-looking Hermutrude. I chose Hermutrude because I thought being so fat she must be in good condition for breeding. I think I chose wrong- she barely engages with Attila (most of our previous females give as good as they get in the displaying stakes), and she has a weird habit of zipping around the bowl and bouncing off the walls when I show up, almost as if she can't control herself. Very strange. But she is cute, in the sense that she only has eyes for food and kind of waggles her fat little body when she thinks she's about to get fed. Still, I get the feeling she wants to remain a spinster... maybe a good excuse to find Attila another lady friend :)

Why we need unions, lesson #539 from the USA

If this was a real farewell for Johnny he'd be digging his fingernails into the podium while they dragged him out by his ankles...

From the New York Times.

Regarding the owner of the Utah coal mine in which a bunch of miners (and rescuers) died recently:

That same year, the National Labor Relations Board filed a complaint accusing Mr. Murray of violating federal labor laws at one of his companies, Maple Creek Mining, in Bentleyville, Pa., about 20 miles south of Pittsburgh. The United Mine Workers said Mr. Murray had threatened to replace union workers at the mine after they talked publicly about a labor dispute.

Mr. Murray has said that none of his miners have ever died in an accident, but federal mine records show otherwise. In April 2001, Thomas M. Ciszewski, a 45-year-old foreman, bled to death in the Powhatan No. 6 mine in Alledonia, Ohio, owned and operated by Mr. Murray’s Ohio Valley Coal Company.

Federal investigators determined that Mr. Ciszewski, a 22-year mining veteran, was on a routine job when a conveyer belt cut off his arm, and was “bleeding profusely from the loss of the limb.” He died, in part, because there was not adequate first aid.

The company was fined a total of $15,000.


See here for more 'why we need unions', and why we need to get rid of Howard.

"People could have been saved"


From a report in The Australian:

SES volunteer Jamie Sterckx told an inquest into the deaths of all five people aboard the Immigration vessel he had seen a man waving at the search plane he was in.

"To me, it looked like a person in the water, a person sort of waving. It was only a fleeting moment," Mr Sterckx said.

The testimony drew gasps from family members of one of the deceased.

Mr Sterckx's testimony supports that of fellow SES volunteer Deborah Marshall and pilot Nathan Coote, who were also on the plane and who also said they saw a person in the water.

The Malu Sara disappeared on October 14 after becoming lost in fog while traversing 74km of open sea between Saibai and Badu islands.

The sightings, which, according to testimony in the inquiry this week, occurred at about 1.30pm on October 15, more than 20 hours after the Malu Sara began making distress calls, indicate it is possible that people could have been saved had authorities acted sooner.



As Gam put it:
"Wouldn't have happened if it'd been a millionaire yachtsman."

Little Children are Sacred, when it's convenient.



In my Torres Strait Islander Studies class on Wednesday, our Koori lecturer/course coordinator sat down and gave us a lengthy spiel on various things, including the way aboriginal people and issues are treated in the media, and John Howard's send-in-the-army 'intervention plan' to make a grab for native title land tackle child sex abuse in aboriginal communities. A lot of what he says reflects what Gam has said on the matter- the fact that the mainstream Australian community isn't concerned with the Howard government sending in the army to aboriginal communities because they see aboriginal people as being somehow different from themselves; less human, less able to look after themselves. They don't believe it could ever happen to them.

But what really stuck with me was his account of when he was living with his family in a small aboriginal community (I'm not sure where) and the white manager of the general store, an English guy in his 50s, went up on charges of abusing young girls in the community. His own daughter, who was 14 at the time charges were finally laid, had a friend who was one of the victims. The daughter gave evidence as a witness at the trial. She was then cross-examined by the barrister engaged by the paedophile. Many of the questions did not pertain to her evidence but to her 'moral proclivities', such as whether she ever engaged in sexual intercourse or dressed provocatively- the same sort of questions that rape victims are routinely bombarded with in the Australian 'justice' system. The same sort of approach that Magic Bellybutton has documented from time to time on her blog. But we're not even talking about the victim here- we're talking about a witness, a child who, because she was female was subjected to attempts to attack her credibility based purely on the way she may or may not have dressed or behaved. What was at stake in this child's evidence against a paedophile who abused her friend was not her truthfulness but whether she dressed in short skirts.

So much for 'little children are sacred'. 'Little children are all potential whores' seems to be an approach Howard and co are perfectly ok with. After all, that's not the bit that makes the papers so it's not going to win him any elections...

Steel drums for a St Lucia wedding


Gam and I stopped off and spoke to the steel drums guy outside the Treasury Casino on our way back from dropping Rachelle off with her boyfriend's brother's wife a bit over a week ago. We wanted to ask him about playing at our wedding ceremony. Rach asked us if we had planned any music or had any musically-inclined friends who might play something at the ceremony. She was probably envisioning a reedy rendition of some hymn or (god forbid) some horrid ballad, but Gam and I immediately thought of the steel drums guy.

Finally, he has a name: 'steel drums guy' actually goes by the name of Desmond. What's more, he immediately agreed to play at our wedding ceremony and refused to let us offer payment for doing so. I think it goes without saying that we'll pay him, seeing as we'd be taking his time on a Saturday, which must be one of his busiest days, and he'll have to go to the bother of travelling to St Lucia. Plus our paying him to play at our wedding will hopefully mean he can get back to his wife and kid quicker than he otherwise might, and we'll have some really lovely music at our wedding. Cool.

Screwed on AWAs, screwed in redundancy.

The Howard government's Valentine to big business.

Joe Hockey's reply to the revelation that workers on AWAs are screwed on redundancy payouts:

"The Howard Government introduced a scheme to guarantee payment of employee entitlements, where the employee had redundancy provisions and the company became insolvent. More than 68,000 workers have received $770million in payments since 2000."


Great. Leaving aside that the scheme began as a vote-buying exercise by the Howard government, the whole point is that on AWAs the workers don't have redundancy provisions (or have really shit ones) and therefore aren't covered by this much-vaunted scheme. Meaning they're screwed both when they're employed and when they're fired.

Weather whining...


Speaking of this crazy weather, including my whinge the other day, I really have run out of clean jeans and trousers to wear! I've still got a pair of jeans in the washing machine from last Saturday, because it's been raining all week and it's been too wet to hang them out. Our machine is a front-loading 'washer/dryer' for which the water consumption is much higher for the dryer than the washer (yeah, huh?) and the dryer more often than not malfunctions and leaves the clothes very hot and sopping wet.

Not to mention that everything (clothes, bedclothes, towels) has taken on a kind of damp feel and smell from all the moisture in the air.

On top of it all, none of this rain is falling in the bloody Wivenhoe dam, so it will have little or no impact on Brisbane's water restrictions. And, after three and a half years of having our good friend Nic's furniture, washing machine and mattress taking up most of the space in our garage while she has been in London, her Mum and uncle are finally due to come and remove it tomorrow. That's a surefire guarantee that the rain's not going away...

Noise pollution deaths mean problem should be taken seriously

From the SMH: noise pollution kills. I can't say I'm surprised at the news.


Research published in recent years has shown noise can increase the levels of stress hormones such as cortisol, adrenaline and noradrenaline in the body, even during sleep. The longer these hormones stay in circulation around the bloodstream, the more likely they are to cause life-threatening physiological problems. High stress levels can lead to heart failure, strokes, high blood pressure and immune problems.

"All this is happening imperceptibly," Professor Prasher said. "Even when you think you are used to the noise, these physiological changes are still happening."



Can we ban leafblowers now?

Leafblower moments Gam and I have witnessed recently:

- A guy outside a unit complex in Toowong blowing rubbish and leaf litter into a stormwater drain
- A guy across the road from us yesterday using a leafblower to blow leaves off the road and into the gutter. This being smack bang in the middle of pretty much the craziest August weather Brisbane has ever experienced.

Retractable Bollards vs Idiots




Bollards win. The one with the SUV is worth watching over and over. What a tool.

Mainstreaming of racism starting to bear ugly fruit

Just because they didn't say 'jews' doesn't mean that racists will start being selective...

The headline for this piece in The Australian shouldn't be 'Fear of rising Anti-Semitism'. The real fear should be that racists- and most racists aren't particularly selective about the ethnic groups they despise- are becoming open about their beliefs to the point where the Australian community may suffer an increase in racist attacks. It's not hard to see why when we have a Prime Minister who openly supports racism as long as it's mainstream and not the sole domain of fringe groups like Australia First.

The incident unfolded as follows:


Two men, who remain at large, bashed 17-year-old Alon Tam with baseball bats near Mister Glick's takeaway shop in Carlisle Street.

[...]

The men had returned to the scene after earlier confronting Ephraim Manshari, 17, who had seen them chasing an Indian Sikh down the road shouting "f***ing Arab" at him.


Why is concern being shown only over the 'anti-semitic' incident rather than the clearly generally racist, violent nature of the people carrying them out? This is really scary stuff, and it's not only the jewish community in Australia who need to be concerned.

Another post on the matter at slackbastard.

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

Testing - Complete

Embedded a google map in the side bar, currently just Brisbane CBD and surrounds. I put icons on it with restaurants we've been to so you can go yourself if you like. Ones we've reviewed have a link to the review. If the map seems too small, click the link below it for a bigger one. You can also zoom in by using the + and - buttons on the map. Enjoy, leave feedback!

Creepy Cult Campaigning Kicks Off!


Thanks LarryB

THE Prime Minister has met in private the most senior leaders of the Exclusive Brethren, including a man who is being investigated by police over his huge spending on Mr Howard's election campaign in 2004.

In his parliamentary office two weeks ago Mr Howard met Mark Mackenzie, a Sydney pump salesman whose former company Willmac funnelled $370,000 into pro-Howard advertising at the last election. Willmac's spending was subsequently investigated by the Australian Electoral Commission and then referred to the Australian Federal Police for a criminal investigation, which is continuing.

Also at the August 8 meeting were the secretive sect's world leader, or "Elect Vessel", Bruce Hales, his brother Stephen, and elder Warwick John. A Brethren spokesman confirmed yesterday that the meeting with Mr Howard had taken place, but denied they had asked for Mr Howard's help on the police investigation, or offered support for his campaign in Bennelong.
...
A Greens campaigner in Bennelong, Matthew Henderson, said the sect was already working on Mr Howard's campaign. At the Prime Minister's recent walk-through at the Eastwood Plaza shopping centre in his electorate, "there were a bunch of people I went to school with, and who I recognise as Brethren, and they appeared to be more than familiar with the Liberal Party supporters' group".

SMH

This bunch of scummy creeps are in a sticky embrace with the Liberals:

In the 2004 Australian federal election the Raven-Taylor-Hales Brethren were linked to political advertisements campaigning for the re-election of John Howard.[17][19] The advertisements were funded by Willmac Enterprises Pty Ltd, a company wholly owned by Mark William Mackenzie who is a member of the Brethren.[20] Willmac's contribution to John Howard's election campaign, totaling $340,000, were later investigated by the Australian Electoral Commission and are currently the source of an ongoing criminal investigation by the Australian Federal Police.[21] In March 2006, members of the Brethren placed press advertisements and distributed leaflets[22] attacking the Australian Tasmanian Greens in the Tasmanian state election.[23]

Prime Minister John Howard has confirmed that he has met with the Raven-Taylor-Hales Brethren, stating he has no problem with the group and that they are "entitled to put their views to the Government".[24] In December 2006, The Age reported that Brethren representatives met with the Australian Attorney-General Phillip Ruddock lobbying for family law changes to "ensure that a child is not subject to a radical lifestyle change without compelling reason".[25] It has also been reported by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation that John Howard had a meeting with Brethren representatives in his parliamentary office on short notice early August 2007. [26] It is known that the Brethren contributed significant money to the Liberal Party at the 2004 election, although the amount has not been disclosed; rumours range between about half a million to about ten million Australian dollars. Thus, it is possible that this latest meeting between the Prime Minister and the Bretheren was related to funding for the 2007 election campaign but the Prime Minister refuses to disclose any information about the subject of the meeting.


And morons keep going on about how Muslims are trying to change Australia. There will be a pay off. That money isn't free, some secret deal has been done to allow a criminal cult to whisper in the government's ear. Seriously, anyone who plans on voting Liberal at the next election is either ignorant or insane.